E-I-E-I-O
Cows, pigs and chickens cause more global warming than
cars, the United Nations Food & Agriculture Organization reports
in a recent study.
Duck, everyone. Run for your life. I can
envision a certain gaggle of media yakkers jumping all over this
report, yanking on it so hard they hyperventilate in their quest
to twist its message into something as utterly black as the
report itself is white.
See? It's what I've been saying for years:
Cars DON'T have any impact on global warming. Which, as we all
know, has never really existed anyway.
The correct take-home message, as stated in
the
introduction to the report on the U.N. Food &
Agriculture Organization web site, is that while the global
livestock industry does contribute heavily to climate change and
worldwide losses in biodiversity, if you flip the coin over you
see that the same industry's potential to help solve those
problems is proportionally huge.
And how would the livestock industry go about
helping to solve those problems? The steps, all very attainable,
are summarized nicely
here, in a story about the U.N. report published
Sunday in the Des Moines Register.
With A Gas Leak Here, And A Gas Leak There ...
A Wal-Mart store that opened this summer on the site of
an old landfill near Cleveland, Ohio, had to be
evacuated and closed for several days last week
for some mysterious plumbing-repair-related reasons.
Rumors about methane leaks have been leaking
around in the media, but local safety officials reportedly
conducted a series of combustible-gas tests, and those tests
turned up negative.
This marks at least the second time that store
has had to abruptly close since it opened in August. And the
timing could hardly be worse for Wal-Mart, what with the
peculiar uptick in people's shopping patterns that we seem to be
experiencing these days.
Pete
Fehrenbach is assistant managing editor of Waste
News. Past installments of this column are collected in
the Inbox archive.
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.wastenews.com