Consumers Back Calls for FDA Definition of
'Natural'
02/15/2006
Source: LOHAS Factbook
Author: justfoods.com
Calls from the Sugar Association for the FDA to officially define
foods that can be labelled as ‘natural’ appear to be supported by the
majority of consumers. In a survey conducted by Harris Interactive,
83% of respondents said they supported the introduction of regulations
to govern the labelling of products as natural.
The vast majority of those questioned in the poll, 85%, felt that
food containing artificial or synthetic ingredients should be
disqualified from being described as natural by manufacturers.
Fifty-two per cent of consumers felt that the amount of processing and
60% of consumers said that whether a raw material is altered should
determine whether or not a product could be described as natural.
"Consumers are increasingly confused by food labelling claims. We
are petitioning the Food and Drug Administration to provide an
official definition of 'natural' and qualify for manufacturers what
can and can't be labelled as natural," stated Andy Briscoe, President
of the Sugar Association. "Consumers in our survey overwhelmingly
agreed that FDA should adopt the 'natural' standards set forth by USDA
for meat and poultry, as the standard for all foods wishing to make a
'natural' claim."
|