Gridirony
With
all the low-key modesty and small-scale unostentatiousness on display at
that little football contest they staged in Detroit a couple days ago
[he typed sarcastically], perhaps the last thing you´d expect to find
written about the game would be anything having to do with environmental
responsibility.
So here, Inbox faithful, is exactly that:
the last thing you´d expect to find, courtesy of
GreenBiz.com. It says here, among other things, that this year´s
game constituted the second consecutive "carbon-neutral" Super Bowl,
meaning basically that the NFL helped plant a whole buncha trees in the
host city -- 2,400 this year in Motown.
On the flip side of the commemorative coin, we have
this story from the Philadelphia Daily News titled
"Big Loser On Super Bowl Sunday? The Environment." (In addition to its
well-worn City of Brotherly Love nickname, Philly -- as noted in this
column on other occasions -- has been hard at work earning a newer
moniker, City of Recycling? Oh Brother, What An Ever-Loving Pain In The
...)
The article profiles Philadelphia streets commissioner Clarena
Tolson, a tireless recycling advocate, and her annual uphill effort
to dissuade revelers from chucking all the packaging and other
recyclable dregs from their Super Gluttony Party blowouts into
landfill-destined containers.
As Tolson notes in the story, "Super Bowl Sunday ranks right up there
with Christmas, July 4 and Labor Day in tonnage [of trash] accumulated
after a day of copious drinking and nonstop gorging."
Whew. I think I may have to stop at the drugstore to pick up a bottle
of Maalox on the way home tonight.
Hammering Away: Next up we have a zero-waste tale that was
e-mailed to me by Ken Carman, who runs West Side P.B.R.R., a
nonprofit community-beautification group in Dayton, Ohio, the Official
Hometown of Inbox. Take it away, Ken.
When I moved into my present home (summer 2004), I noticed one of
my neighbors was always out walking the streets picking up aluminum
cans. Wanting to reward and encourage her efforts, I began giving her
all of the cans I collected (primarily from litter cleanups I did).
Well, to show her appreciation, she began picking up glass and plastic
as well, which I would pick up from her house. I began to tell her about
other things she could recycle and how to do it most efficiently, and
before long I was picking up an occasional bag of tin cans, plastic
grocery sacks, and even kitchen waste in a bread bag.
Later I discovered that she was carting all of her aluminum cans to
her basement and crushing them with a sledgehammer. This concerned me no
small bit, so I asked her how much she earned for her cans, and we
determined that she averaged about $10 a week. I told her I would pay
her $10 a week and simply take the cans off of her hands (she no longer
has to crush or haul them to the recycle center). She continues to
collect recyclable litter in the amount of at least one full garbage
container per week, and aluminum cans as well.
She has not had to take her city-supplied trash can to the alley for
over six months (to my best recollection), generating zero waste at her
residence. The kicker of this is she will be 93 years young this spring.
One Small Laugh For Inbox-kind: Headline of the Day goes to
this story from CNN.com having to do with an
experiment conducted by Russian astronauts at the international space
station. They essentially stuck a radio inside an old spacesuit and
shoved it out into space, where, for about 90 hours or however long the
radio´s batteries held out, the suit was expected to act as a satellite
transmitting signals to ham radios and police scanners back home.
(Eventually the spacesuit will be sucked into Earth´s atmosphere and
incinerated.) The title: "One small step for trash is giant leap for
ham-kind."
It´s not every day you get to use a word like ham-kind.
Pete Fehrenbach
is assistant managing editor of Waste News. Past installments of this
column are collected in
the Inbox
archive.
Entire
contents copyright 2005 by Crain Communications Inc. All rights reserved. |