Groups Sue Feds Over
Colorado River Fish
February 17, 2006 — By Amanda Lee Myers, Associated Press
PHOENIX — Five environmental groups
filed a lawsuit against the federal government Thursday, saying it has
failed to protect endangered fish in the Colorado River.
Because of the failure of the Interior Department and its Bureau of
Reclamation to provide a more natural environment in the river, the
humpback chub, razorback sucker, Colorado pikeminnow and bonytail chub
are in danger of extinction, the suit alleges.
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Arizona, contends the
government is violating federal law by operating Glen Canyon Dam in a
manner that fails to protect the features of Grand Canyon National Park
and Glen Canyon National Recreation Area.
The dam straddles the Arizona-Utah border, backing up the Colorado River
to form Lake Powell. The suit contends the dam releases water at
unnatural temperatures, quantity, quality and frequency, and deprives
the Grand Canyon of sediment and needed nutrients.
The lawsuit asks the court to order Interior Secretary Gale Norton and
the Reclamation Bureau to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service over the effects of dam operations, and ultimately, provide a
"more natural flow and water temperature regime" and "adequate
downstream nutrients and sediment."
The species in the most danger is the humpback chub, the adult
population of which declines between 15 percent and 20 percent each
year, according to a 2005 report by the U.S. Geological Survey.
Currently, there are between 3,000 and 5,000 in the Colorado River, but
that number could decline sharply to between 1,500 and 2,000 in the next
10 to 15 years if nothing is done.
"Arizona's native fish are overwhelmingly imperiled," said Robin Silver,
conservation chair for the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the
plaintiffs.
For years, officials have studied how to regulate the temperature of
water released from the dam, said Barry Wirth, spokesman for the Bureau
of Reclamation's Upper Colorado region. But change takes time, he said.
"There's a lot of things that come into play," he said. "We know the
technology works. It's just not an off-the-shelf thing."
Wirth said programs such as reducing predators and water flow strategies
help the humpback chub and other species.
Neither Wirth nor agency spokeswoman Trudy Harlow in Washington would
comment directly on the lawsuit.
The suit was filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club,
Glen Canyon Institute, Living Rivers and Arizona Wildlife Federation. It
followed another legal battle last month between the federal government
and two environmental groups, Grand Canyon Trust and Earthjustice.
In that case, U.S. District Judge Frederick Martone ruled the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service recovery plan for the endangered fish was
ineffective. He ordered a new plan to include more specific goals and a
timeline for recovery.
Although the ruling was a victory for the environmental groups, a better
recovery plan won't save the fish unless the government acts on it,
Silver said.
"A recovery plan does not save species because they're never obeyed," he
said. "It won't cause anything to happen."
Source: Associated Press
|