The hydrogen economy has yet to get its legs but if or
when it does, it could put the country light-years ahead.
The ultimate goal is the replacement of traditional fossil
fuels, although the pathway to get there is full of
potholes.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
The federal government wants to do its part to
facilitate the hydrogen economy, a development that could
affect the way electricity is generated as well as how
cars are driven. It has allocated $1.7 billion over five
years toward the effort. The key question, of course, is
whether the costs are worth the benefits. While the answer
is not yet known, advocates of greater research say that
fuel cell cars and fuel cell electric generation would
create zero emissions.
"People understand the appeal," says Susan Hock,
director of electric and hydrogen technology systems for
the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in a conversation
at her Golden, Co. office. "We could wean ourselves from
fossil fuels and become more energy independent to power
cars and homes -- and the only emission would be distilled
water. But, you have to produce, distribute and store it."
Hock goes on to say that she believes the hydrogen
economy will have its first commercial uses for
transportation. That's because the major automobile
manufacturers along with the oil companies are working
jointly to bring about forward momentum.
Hydrogen does not stand alone in nature and must
therefore be separated from oxygen -- but to break it out
requires energy produced by other fuels. If fossil fuels
are used, the process then consumes more energy than it
creates and the end result is likely more pollution. If
renewable sources are used, the procedure is far more
benign. But then questions arise about whether it is more
efficient to make hydrogen or just produce electric energy
directly. Nuclear proponents say that their processes are
both efficient and non-polluting.
The Skepticism
It is also difficult to store hydrogen -- something the
U.S. Department off Energy has said is the number one
priority when it comes to commercializing fuel-cell
vehicles. This issue is now the focus of countless
universities and federal laboratories along with
industrial partners that include car makers and oil
companies. The goal is to travel 300 miles before a car
would have to refill.
Right now, though, filling cars and sport utility
vehicles with the equivalent of one gallon of gasoline
takes about 14,500 gallons of uncompressed
hydrogen, says Sandia National Laboratories. Meantime, the
production of hydrogen is inefficient. But Hock says that
hydrogen has nearly three times the energy content of
gasoline, which more than compensates for the efficiency
losses.
Critics also say that because hydrogen is hazardous,
any leakage could be highly explosive and might possibly
accumulate in the atmosphere and harm parts of the ozone
layer. Moreover, the transportation of the hydrogen is
problematic. According to Hock, more than 1,000 kilometers
of steel pipeline in the United States is now being used
to transport it. Natural gas companies and pipeline
experts estimate that new hydrogen pipelines would be 30
percent more expensive than traditional gas pipelines.
Progress is being made now. In the 1970s, for instance,
fuel cell parts were custom-made. Now more and more of
them are pressed and molded. That has lowered the cost of
manufacturing, although the materials that go into their
making -- platinum and membranes -- are expensive. Indeed,
the cost of fuel cells has already been cut significantly
in the last 15 years and it will continue to fall, says
Hock.
"The cost of a fuel cell prototype remains high at
$3,000 a kilowatt, but the high production volume of
500,000 units per year" is projected to reduce that price
tag to $200 a kilowatt, she says. Eventually, she says the
cost could decline to $30 a kilowatt. At the same time,
Hock is hopeful that the cost to produce hydrogen could
drop from today's $3.60 a gallon of gasoline equivalent to
as little as $2 for the same unit by 2015.
Why place so much emphasis on fuel-cell vehicles when
hybrid cars exist today? Such cars use an internal
combustion engine that run on petroleum. But, unlike
conventional cars, they convert energy during braking or
coasting and store that in a battery used by the electric
motor. That conversion process is using energy that is
normally wasted by all gas cars. That's why hybrids get
better gas mileage in the city.
Ali Emadi, director of Advanced Automotive Systems at
Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, says that
hybrids are a reality now: "Clearly, fuel cell vehicles
are not currently economically feasible. In addition,
their overall efficiency is less than hybrids. Therefore,
hybrids are going to be more and more popular every year.
In fact, I believe that this is the trend not only for the
short term, but also for the long term."
The Transition
Hock disagrees, saying that hybrids will serve as a
bridge to the hydrogen economy. Hybrid vehicles will
decrease oil consumption, she says. But, because the
demand for oil is expected to increase, any long-term
solution must rely more on petroleum substitutes. And
companies are working toward this. Electric Fuel, for
example, is developing a prototype that will power cars
and buses with fuel cells for a whole shift without having
to refuel. Already, the New York City-based company proved
that it can run a bus for 101 miles without having to stop
and juice up.
"Now is the time for the U.S. government and U.S.
industry to create a partnership that can lead the world
in the charge to achieve this vision ...," says Byron
McCormick of General Motors Corp., in a release. "We were
given one mandate by our management: Take the automobile
out of the environmental debate."
By any measure, the transition to a hydrogen economy
will take lots of time. Many well qualified entities are
working on technologies that would overcome the current
obstacles. President Bush along with hydrogen innovators
say that fuel cell vehicles could make their commercial
break-through by 2020. And if such a vision comes to be,
even the biggest optimists agree it may be another 20
years to make a complete transformation to the hydrogen
economy. The prospects and the subsequent benefits are
forcing government and private industry to put the pedal
to the metal.
For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|