Renewables have largest potential to reduce GHG

LONDON, England, February 15, 2006 (Refocus Weekly)

Renewables have the largest technical potential to avoid greenhouse gas emissions by the end of this century, according to a report released by the UK government.

The overall conclusion of the report, ‘Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change,’ is that rising concentrations of GHG may have more serious impacts than previously believed. In the report's foreword, UK Prime Minister Tony Blair says "it is now plain that the emission of GHG ... is causing global warming at a rate that is unsustainable.”

While nuclear could avoid 300 GtCO2e by 2100, biological sequestration could avoid 350, CO2 capture and storage could avoid 2,000, non-CO2 GHG reduction could avoid 500 and energy efficiency improvements could avoid the emission of 1,000 GtCO2e. Renewable energy technologies, on the other hand, are estimated to have the potential to avoid the emission of 3,000 GtCO2e.

Energy efficiency is the dominant option for avoiding CO2 emissions until 2030, while renewables, along with nuclear and sequestration, contribute more to the portfolio later. The lower the stabilization level, the earlier the more expensive options will have to be applied, it explains.

The technical potential of renewables by 2020-2025 is estimated at 130 to 2,301 exajoules (EJ) a year, with ocean thermal at 21, geothermal at 41, wind at 7 to 10, hydro at 35 to 55, biomass at 72 to 137, and solar at 16 to 230 EJ/a. In the longer term, renewables are estimated to provide 6,401 to 7,000 EJ, of which ocean thermal and geothermal contribute 20 EJ each, hydro to be 30 to 130, wind to be 130 to 640, biomass at 275 to 1,300, and solar to range from 160 to 5,000 EJ.

“Several estimates have been published for the technical potential of renewable energy,” with an important factor underlying the wide ranges being the different assumptions on land availability. “Wide ranges in the order of a few hundred up to a few thousand EJ are also reported for wind-based electricity and solar-based electricity (but) even the lowest estimates are equal to several times the present world electricity consumption.”

“For PV and wind, the problem of integrating each into the existing energy system may play an important role in determining the market potential,” it adds. “Renewable energy options are currently among the more expensive options (US$40 to $60 per tonne of CO2), but costs are likely to go down substantially over time.”


Click here for more info...

Visit http://www.sparksdata.co.uk/refocus/ for your international energy focus!!

Refocus © Copyright 2005, Elsevier Ltd, All rights reserved.