Blair warned
against rushing to build nuclear power plants MPs accuse ministers |
Concern over safety
Jul 10, 2006 - The Herald
Author(s): Michael Settle
TONY Blair may be convinced the future is nuclear but he has a tough
battle on his hands convincing even his own MPs.
Today the Prime Minister is warned by an inf luential group about the
dangers of rushing into the construction of new nuclear power stations.
On the eve of the eagerlyawaited publication of the government's
energy review tomorrow, members of the House of Commons Trade and
Industry Committee accuse ministers of failing to carry out a "full and
proper assessment" of future energy needs.
The cross-party body urges the government to ensure it has "broad
political and public support" for its policy before pressing ahead with
potentially farreaching decisions.
Struggling to convince his own MPs, Mr Blair has an even bigger
battle to persuade the public. An ICM survey for GMTV published
yesterday showed that only 38-per cent of people wanted nuclear power to
play a role in meeting Britain's future energy needs.
The vast majority opted for renewables - some 79-per cent wanted
solar to play a part, 76-per cent backed wind while half said they would
like to see more efficient coal and gas-fired power stations having a
role.
Almost three-quarters, some 72-per cent, of respondents, said that
they would be concerned if a nuclear power station was built near them.
Asked how they rated the safety of nuclear power, 16-per cent described
it as "very safe", 42-per cent as "quite safe", 24- per cent as "not
very safe" and 12-per cent as "not safe at all".
The government's review is expected to conclude that nuclear power is
now viable and should play a role in meeting Britain's future energy
needs alongside a five-fold expansion in "renewables" such as solar and
wind power.
It will argue that without nuclear power, Britain will become
dependent on gas for 55-per cent of its energy needs by 2020 - up from
38-per cent currently - with up to 90-per cent of that imported from
potentially unstable regions such as the Middle East, Central Asia and
Russia.
With the impending closure of older nuclear and coal-fired power
stations, 25 gigawatts of new electricity generating capacity will have
to be built by 2020. This is the equivalent of 30-per cent of current
capacity. It is thought that the Department of Trade and Industry
envisages building six modern nuclear power stations, each capable of
generating 1.6 gigawatts of power.
With Scottish opposition seemingly inevitable, these are likely to be
in England.
But at the same time, the reviewwill set out proposals to raise the
proportion of electricity generated through renewables from 4- per cent
to 20-per cent with support for technologies such as offshore wind farms
currently seen as uneconomic.
In its report, the committee says: "A full and proper assessment of
the projected future generating capacity should have been conducted to
inform debate before the government undertook its review."
The option of extending the life of some existing nuclear stations
could mean "the potential energy gap faced by the government will not be
as severe as that which the current energy review assumes".
It stresses that if the government does opt for a new generation of
nuclear power stations, all the costs of building, operating and
decommissioning should fall to the privatesector investors who build
them and not to the taxpayer.
In Scotland, where the energy issue is likely to play a major role in
party politics up to next year's Holyrood elections, Jack McConnell has
come under fire over nuclear new-build. The First Minister's position is
that there will be no new Scottish nuclear power stations until the
issue of waste management is resolved.
While last week David Cameron said that the Tories would develop a
new generation of nuclear power stations only as a "last resort",
yesterday Alan Duncan, the Shadow Trade Secretary, made clear his party
would not halt new nuclear power stations if it won the next general
election.
Ahead of next weekend's G8 summit, leaked documents yesterday
suggested an action plan for "global energy security" is to be agreed at
St Petersburg, involving a mass expansion of nuclear power.
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|