When the heat is on, the transmission grid is tested.
And it passed without serious incident during the
unseasonably hot temperatures in mid July. But, reserve
margins in some parts of the United States took a dip,
emphasizing the need for new and modern forms of
generation that can be sent over a robust transmission
system.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
The recent spate of hot weather is only a reminder of a
much broader debate -- the need for more investment in the
North American grid. The energy law that passed in 2005
sets out to force utilities and other transmission owners
to comply with mandatory rules to ensure more reliability.
Federal regulators, meanwhile, are working to establish
incentive-based rates and using its newfound backstop
permitting authority.
Last week, Ontario, Canada almost broke through its
previous peak usage, generating about 26,000 megawatts
while Philadelphia-based PECO surpassed its previous
all-time high peak set a year ago, using roughly 8,600
megawatts. President Denis O'Brien said the local
distribution system performed very well under the extreme
heat and unprecedented demand. "Our customers depend on us
to provide reliable power when they need it the most, and
PECO came through, once again."
The whole scenario stresses the need for ample
reserves, or surplus power to meet unusually high demand.
Nationally, in the United States, reserves during the heat
wave fell to 15 percent. While acceptable, it doesn't
allow much room for economic growth.
To plan, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is
now authorized to ensure new "reliability standards."
Generally, that entails motivating investors to put up the
capital needed to expand the transmission system. Toward
that end, utilities would be able to re-capture their
investments at a faster rate. FERC also has the ability
now to establish national corridors where transmission is
sorely needed.
Transmission investment has declined in real terms --
adjusted for inflation -- from 1975 to 1998. While there
have been increases since 1998, FERC says that the level
is still less than what was invested in 1975. Over the
same time period, however, the demand for electricity has
doubled. That's resulted in a significant decrease in
transmission capacity, requiring new lines get built.
"Under-investment is a national problem," says Joe
Kelliher, chairman of the FERC. "The commission proposes a
national solution that encourages investment in all
regions of the country." The incentives apply to regional
transmission organizations (RTOs), traditional utilities
and to transcos, or those that operate transmission lines
but do not own any generation.
Optimal Investment
The PJM Interconnection, which is an RTO that serves 51
million people in 13 states and the District of Columbia,
is progressive. Its board just approved a 15-year
blueprint to construct $1.3 billion in electric
transmission upgrades. That includes a 240-mile,
500-kilovolt transmission line from southwestern
Pennsylvania to Virginia to be constructed by Allegheny
Power and Dominion.
The total plan upgrades are expected to provide grid
reliability through 2011 and are estimated to reduce
congestion costs by $200 million to $300 million annually.
To meet long-term needs through 2021, the RTO is looking
at 10 other transmission lines totaling $10 billion,
including the high-voltage transmission line projects
proposed by American Electric Power, Allegheny Power and
Pepco Holdings. Transmission owners for these projects
have been authorized to begin the permitting process and
undergo environmental impact assessments as well as
potential right-of-way acquisitions.
All told, PJM has authorized more than $4 billion of
accumulated transmission investment since its planning
process began six years ago, resulting in an additional
18,717 megawatts of new generation being interconnected,
with 3,777 megawatts of generation now under construction.
More than $500 million in transmission projects have been
completed.
"Regional transmission planning works," said Audrey
Zibelman, PJM's executive vice president and chief
operating officer. "It's stimulating the necessary
investments in the grid to maintain reliability and to
improve economic efficiency." She adds that the planning
process has evolved from one that focuses on upgrades to
one that concentrates on the long-term and better
addresses economic efficiency and major transmission
additions.
Elsewhere, four governors of Western states have given
their support to the building of 1,300 miles of power
lines at a cost of $2 billion. If the projects are
constructed and begin delivering electricity by 2011,
lines would stretch from Wyoming and into Utah, Nevada and
Southern California. The governors say that the new lines
are essential: They note that the demand for power has
risen by 60 percent in the last 20 years but that the
region's transmission system has only grown by 20 percent.
Certainly, the average age of assets along with a
growing demand for power and limited capital have combined
and sent warning shots across the bow of the American
people and their elected representatives. The 2003
Blackout, for instance, is said to have cost anywhere
between $4 billion and $10 billion, which includes not
only direct losses but also indirect ones such as those
tied to lost opportunities.
Industry experts say that the optimal investment in the
grid would be $100 billion, paid out in equal installments
over 10 years. Progressive technologies exist that would
enhance the system and bring it in line with a high-tech
society. But transmission lines compete with other capital
intensive projects for money. With a new set of federal
rules on the books, the hope is that such transmission
projects will attract new investment and help usher the
nation's energy infrastructure into the 21st century. For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|