Edison won't
attempt restart of power plant
Jun 20, 2006 - San Gabriel Valley Tribune, Calif.
Author(s): Kevin Smith
Jun. 20--SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA--Edison announced Monday it has
abandoned plans to return its Mohave Generating Station to service.
The coal-fired facility in Laughlin, Nev. was shut down in late
December for failing to meet air pollution standards. The plant had
generated about 7 percent of the Southland's electricity although it
reportedly produced high levels of sulphur dioxide emissions.
Three environmental groups filed a lawsuit against Edison, alleging
the plant contributed to haze in the Grand Canyon.
The utility subsequently entered into an agreement with the groups
whereby the company would upgrade environmental controls at the
generating facility at a cost of about $1billion.
SCE, a division of Rosemead-based Edison International, had been
using water from an aquifer to push pulverized coal through a pipeline
to the Mohave plant. But local Indian tribes -- who hold the rights to
the use of that water -- wanted the utility to find another water
source.
On Monday, Edison announced that the challenges -- when taken
together -- had became "insurmountable."
"After discussing this decision with our co-owners, all have agreed
to jointly develop a plan for the plant's future," Edison spokesman Gil
Alexander said. "We believe everything reasonably possible was done to
return Mohave to service."
Alexander said timing was a big factor in Edison's decision to back
out of the picture.
"For the upgrade investment to be cost effective to our customers, we
concluded that the facility would have to be back in operation by 2010,"
he said. "And in 2026 the plant's right to cooling water from the
Colorado River would expire."
Matt Freedman, a staff attorney for the Utility Reform Network, a
nonprofit consumer organization that represents residential and small
business customers of California's large, investor-owned utilities, said
he was surprised by Edison's decision.
However, he agreed it makes sense.
"Overall, we think it's probably the right decision," he said. "There
are lots of hurdles associated with bringing the plant back online, and
the result would be a coal-fired power plant. California is looking to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions connected with it's electrical supply.
This wouldn't fit in with those goals."
Edison owns a 56 stake (or 885 megawatts) in the Mohave Generating
Station. One megawatt is enough to serve the electricity needs of 650
homes at any given time.
The other owners are Salt River Project (20 percent, or 316
megawatts); Nevada Power Co. (14 percent, or 221 megawatts); and the Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power (10 percent, or 158 megawatts).
All of the other owners -- with the exception of Salt River Project
-- agree the challenges outweigh the needed fixes to bring the plant
back online.
Alexander said Edison has already secured enough additional power
from other sources to make up for the loss of the Mohave plant.
"There are adequate power supplies for this summer, barring any
extreme or unforeseen circumstances," he said.
Alexander noted, however, that California's burgeoning population
growth will fuel increasing power needs in the coming years.
Southern California Edison serves a population of more than 13
million people via 4.7million customer accounts in a 50,000-square- mile
service area within central, coastal and Southern California.
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|