Mercury bills
based on scientific findings
Jun 26, 2006 - The Harrisburg Patriot
Your editorial ("Elemental Risk," June 22) urges legislators to heed
the scientific findings when it comes to mercury. The paper ought to
take its own advice.
It's clear The Patriot-News has not been listening to the facts
surrounding this critical public health issue. My bill will protect the
public's health just as much as the DEP rule. People need to know that
they are exposed to mercury by eating fish in massive quantities. It
poses no risk through inhalation or physical contact. A nationwide study
by the Centers for Disease Control found not a single instance where a
person had unhealthy levels of mercury in their blood.
We need to be smart in how we reduce mercury emissions. The DEP rule
will threaten jobs, raise electric bills and could reduce our generating
capacity while providing no added public health benefit. Remember this
the next time you're discussing utility shut-offs in winter.
This fear that no reductions will occur in Pennsylvania is simply
misplaced. Senate Bill 1201 requires an 86 percent reduction in
emissions from our power plants. Mercury emissions are already down 33
percent since 1999, and DEP's own data show that 90 percent of our
generating capacity will have enhanced pollution controls in place in
the coming years. The science to support cause and effect surrounding
hotspots is just not there.
I'm proud of my colleagues who sifted through the rhetoric, personal
attacks and misinformation to vote overwhelmingly and in bipartisan
fashion for Senate Bill 1201. It's responsible public policy that
protects the health of every Pennsylvanian. Sen. MARY JO WHITE Chairman,
Senate Environmental Resources & Energy Committee Harrisburg
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|