The cyclical economy may have come full circle and the
result may produce the need for more power generation. In
the years following the 2001 recession, an oversupply
existed, causing projects to be delayed or canceled. But
the economy is now "robust," which has led some major
utility executives to predict the need for more plants.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
After some painful times, utilities have watched their
spending and created new efficiencies. The real question
is whether the glut that was created from overly
aggressive expansion plans has been burned off or whether
excess capacity still exists. Under any circumstance, the
long-term expectation is that the population will grow and
the need for cheap and abundant electricity will expand
along with it. As the economy improves, credit will ease
and investor confidence will return. At that point,
construction can begin anew, particularly as older plants
start to be retired.
The need for additional power plants may be one thing.
But, curtailing emissions and getting such facilities
sited is another matter. Americans expect the lights to
remain on all the time while paying as little as possible,
says Michael Morris, CEO of American Electric Power at a
conference sponsored by Standard & Poor's. They "are
trying to figure out how to get to heaven without dying."
At the same time, Morris says that regulators and other
policymakers must continually be informed when it comes to
energy industry matters. Reliability and financial issues
are complex and must always be conveyed to decision
makers. Power companies survive by providing good service,
he says, and are always vigilant when it comes to ensuring
customers receive superior products and services. "You've
got to get a working relationship when you are asking for
something."
Constructing power plants, of course, is a much riskier
proposition than it used to be. With deregulation, the
burden is on power-plant operators to run at maximum
efficiency and to find buyers for their electricity,
preferably before the first shovel goes into the ground.
Without such measures, they couldn't get the financing.
Still, there's risk. And that's why investors are
demanding at least 10 percent earnings growth -- a good
bit higher than the 2 percent earned traditionally under
regulation.
To maximize productivity, some companies have tried to
achieve size and scope and have built state-of-the-art
facilities that burn fuel cleanly and efficiently. It's
all to win fast approval and to cut the cost of
operations. During the late-1990s, companies perceived an
energy shortage and worked to acquire or build such plants
to meet the expected demand at 2.5 percent annual growth.
"Cost overruns in construction are a key risk for us,"
says David Sokol, CEO of MidAmerican Energy, at the S&P
conference. Costs are 35 percent greater today, he says,
creating "a huge headwind for the industry, which is now
in a building cycle."
Cautious Lenders
Altogether, 122 plants have at least been started in
the last decade, driving up debt levels from $23 billion
in 1999 to $49 billion in 2001, says Thomson Financial
Securities. Wall Street rewarded those companies
initially, pushing the values on some independent power
producers' stocks such as Calpine and Mirant through the
roof; some independent producers traded at
price-to-earnings ratios of between 20 and 30 --
oftentimes double that of traditional utilities.
The sky became the limit. But supply eventually
exceeded demand and the Enron mess made lenders and
investors skeptical. Some of the highfliers like Calpine
and Mirant suddenly tanked. Simply put, the value
reflected in the forward price of a kilowatt-hour came
down. Investors then realized that the return on their
capital invested would not be as much and their earnings
would not be as great. Stock prices therefore dropped,
which then hurt their currency in the market to borrow
money.
Now utilities and in particular the unregulated
"merchant" operators are trying to shore up their balance
sheets. Mirant, for instance, has cut capital spending and
is selling non-strategic assets to create more liquidity.
It has also canceled or deferred at least 8,300 megawatts
in projects that it had previously made public.
Unregulated power plants are still troubled. And it may
take some time to get the full use of those assets. In any
event, investors and lenders will want to ensure that
future projects are fully contracted before they would get
built.
For the foreseeable future, most of the construction by
investor-owned utilities will occur in regions where
companies can support their trading and marketing
activities and where the economies are expanding such as
in Florida. That region is expected to experience an
electricity demand of 1,000 MW annually. The Northeast,
meantime, is short of supply. But strict environmental
laws mean that mostly natural gas plants are being
developed, which are more costly to operate in today's
economy.
"There is a risk in (lack of) diversity of fuel
sources," says Kevin Burke, CEO of Con Edison, at the S&P
roundtable. "At the same time, it would be tough to get a
coal or nuclear plant built in this part of the country."
New York City will add about 1,000 megawatts in the next
year.
Coal, generally, has a bright future. The Department of
Energy is predicting that 87 gigawatts of new coal-fired
generation will get built by 2025. That's 174 plants
averaging 500 megawatts each that equates to a total
investment of $119 billion. But the utilities doing the
developing will be those with the deep pockets and those
with balance sheets consisting of 60 percent equity and 40
percent debt -- the inverse of the late 1990s.
Today, the price of coal is about half the price of
natural gas. If that spread continues, a newly constructed
modern coal power plant could likely cover its fixed costs
and reward shareholders. The challenge, however, for a new
coal power plant is its much higher upfront costs and
lengthy construction cycle.
Just about all utilities have spent the last five years
paring down debt and beefing up balance sheets -- not
taking on new risks. Power producers have learned that
they, too, are subject to boom and bust cycles. They know
that a balanced debt-to-equity mix and a diversified
generation portfolio is insulation from future downturns.
Now that the economy is looking up, some high-powered
utilities are ready to roar, and to invest in modern
generation. For far more extensive news on the energy/power
visit: http://www.energycentral.com
.
Copyright © 1996-2005 by CyberTech,
Inc. All rights reserved.
|