Scotland may not
need more nuclear power
Jun 28, 2006 - Scotsman, The
Author(s): Hamish Macdonell Scottish Political Editor
JACK McConnell believes Scotland can avoid building new nuclear power
stations by becoming the "world leader" in renewable energy.
The First Minister has repeatedly refused to declare his position on
new power stations until the issue of nuclear waste has been resolved.
But The Scotsman understands he now believes Scotland can become nuclear
free if it invests heavily in renewables over the next few years.
This comes as Tony Blair, the Prime Minister, is set to announce the
results of the government's energy review, which is expected to
recommend a "balanced" energy policy, including new nuclear power
stations. A source close to the First Minister said that "different
parts of the UK might contribute in different ways" to this policy,
suggesting Scotland might concentrate on renewables and England on new
nuclear stations.
The source said ministers did not believe that nuclear companies
would be "knocking at our door asking to build new nuclear stations"
because transmission charges make it more costly to produce electricity
in remote parts of Britain.
Another senior Labour insider stressed that while there had been "no
deal" with Westminster to give Scotland a nuclear opt-out, that was the
way the Executive wanted to go.
Energy is shaping up to be a crucial issue at next year's election.
The Scottish National Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens are
all opposed to new nuclear power stations with the Conservatives in
favour.
Labour's official policy is also pro-nuclear. But Mr McConnell is
aware, not only that such a stance could cost him votes next May but
also a chance of a coalition partner in the Lib Dems.
In an attempt to steer a path between the two parties, Mr McConnell
recently agreed to back a more open Labour policy for next year's
Holyrood elections, allowing the party to campaign on renewables,
extending the licences of existing nuclear stations and "keeping options
open" on new nuclear stations. However, it now appears that he has
pulled back from that commitment.
About a third of Scotland's electricity comes from the nuclear power
stations at Hunterston and Torness. Mr McConnell believes they can be
kept on line for ten years beyond the end of their licences. By the time
Torness comes to the end of its working life in 2031, Mr McConnell hopes
renewables will be sufficiently advanced to fill the gap.
He put particular emphasis on the possibilities presented by
renewables yesterday, saying:
"Scotland's most significant contribution will be in renewables.
We've already seen massive expansion of renewable energy in Scotland. We
have the potential, as yet untapped in some areas, to make an even more
significant contribution, both here in Scotland and elsewhere in the
UK."
The First Minister said: "Nuclear power makes up a significant
contribution to Scotland's energy resource. It cannot be wished away ...
but the great asset we have is in renewables."
Mr McConnell also changed his language on nuclear waste, suggesting
for the first time that it might be dumped north of the Border - but
only with the full backing of local communities. This has raised the
prospect of England building new nuclear power stations and Scotland
taking the waste.
Roger Crofts, an expert on energy and the secretary of the Royal
Society of Edinburgh's recent study into energy, said that while it was
possible that Scotland might be able to meet its energy needs without
new nuclear stations, there were many problems to overcome.
This included finding a way of storing electricity from renewable
energy sources before it could be used to carry the burden of the
country's needs.
He said the crucial period was between 2012 and 2020, not after 2030.
This was the time before either new nuclear stations could come on
stream and before the benefits of renewables would really kick in.
Mr Crofts also cast doubt on whether Mr McConnell could simply decide
to extend the lives of existing nuclear stations. He said: "It is not
for politicians to decide whether the existing nuclear stations can be
extended, it's a technical question about the graphite cores of the
reactor. Our assessment was that you might only be able to extend the
existing nuclear stations for five years maximum."
Mr Crofts said the Executive had to keep all its options open to
cover the energy gap after 2012 and this might mean importing gas to
fuel new gas-fired stations.
Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP's Holyrood leader, insisted renewables could
provide the answer to Scotland's energy needs and no new nuclear
stations were needed. The Greens welcomed Mr McConnell's apparent
conversion to a non-nuclear future.
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|