U.S. at Risk of Dependence on Foreign Natural Gas

6/19/2006 1:07:00 PM


To: National Desk

Contact: Sonja Gold, 972-883-6325; Kevin Finneran, 202-965-5648; Web: http://www.issues.org

DALLAS, June 19 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The United States, long "addicted" to foreign oil, now risks becoming dependent on foreign natural gas as well, according to an article in the summer Issues in Science and Technology.

In Natural Gas: The Next Energy Crisis?, Gary Schmitt of the American Enterprise Institute, writes that demand for natural gas is rising rapidly, but supply is lagging far behind. Expanding domestic supplies, taking steps to create a global market, and countering Russian efforts to create a dominant market position are critical to reducing U.S. dependence on foreign gas, he says.

Schmitt's article is one of five energy-related articles in the summer Issues.

In The Myth of Energy Insecurity, Philip Auerswald of George Mason University argues that increasing oil imports do not pose a threat to long-term U.S national security. Indeed, Auerswald views the recent run-up in oil prices as highly beneficial, arguing that increasing prices create powerful incentives for overdue investments that have the long-term potential to increase industrial productivity, lower consumer costs, and limit the adverse effects of global climate change.

In Power Play: A More Reliable U.S. Electric System, Jay Apt, Lester Lave, and Granger Morgan of Carnegie Mellon University lament the continuing problem of power outages in the United States, especially as compared with other industrialized countries. U.S. utilities could learn a lot by examining the experience of foreign utilities, other U.S. industries, and even their own nuclear power plants, they write.

In New Nukes, Richard Lester of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology argues that the Bush administration's plan to use fuel reprocessing as the spark to revive nuclear power will not succeed. Only centralized interim waste storage can make a difference in the near term, he believes.

In Nuclear Waste and the Distant Future, Per Peterson and William Kastenberg of the University of California, Berkeley, and Michael Corradini of the University of Wisconsin, write that regulation of nuclear hazards must be consistent with rules governing other hazardous materials and must balance its risks against those linked to other energy sources.

Also in the Summer 2006 Issues:

The Pentagon's Defense Review: Not Ready for Prime Time. Leading Washington defense analyst Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr., argues that the quadrennial review fails to realign the military against new threats or reorder funding priorities to meet those threats.

DEE-FENSE! DEE-FENSE! Preparing for the Pandemic Flu. Henry Miller of the Hoover Institution writes that federal research, economic incentives for industry, and a more responsive regulatory regime will all be necessary to produce a timely and widely available vaccine.

A Healthy Mind for a Healthy Population. The U.S. health care system must pay more attention to providing quality care to people with mental health or substance-use conditions, write Mary Jane England, president of Regis College, and Ann E.K. Page of the Institute of Medicine.

Let Engineers Go to College. C. Judson King of the University of California, Berkeley, argues that the best preparation for a productive and satisfying engineering career is a broad undergraduate education followed by a postgraduate degree, as in law, business, and medicine.

ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY is the award-winning journal of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine and the University of Texas at Dallas. The University of Texas at Dallas is an equal opportunity/affirmative action university.

http://www.usnewswire.com/

-0-

/© 2006 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/