Mercury limits
for power plants:
N.C. tops federal rules in restricting release of
toxic substance from new, existing coal- fired facilities
Nov 10, 2006 - The Charlotte Observer, N.C.
Author(s): Bruce Henderson
Nov. 10--North Carolina set its first limits Thursday on the amount
of mercury that coal-fired power plants may release, joining several
states that have set tougher standards than the Bush administration's
for the widespread contaminant.
Mercury, which occurs naturally in coal, takes especially hazardous
form when it spews from smokestacks and falls into water. Pregnant women
who eat contaminated fish risk giving birth to babies with lower
intelligence and learning problems.
In March, state health authorities broadened their warnings about
eating mercury-contaminated fish. In addition to four freshwater species
caught in Eastern North Carolina, the list now includes largemouth bass
caught anywhere in the state.
The state Environmental Management Commission, which held packed
mercury hearings in Charlotte and other cities last spring, struck a
compromise Thursday that utilities and environmentalists praised.
It gives Duke Energy and Raleigh-based Progress Energy until 2018 to
install mercury controls on their 14 existing power plants or shut them
down. That's six years sooner than had been earlier proposed.
New plants, such as the two units Duke plans to build in Rutherford
County, must come equipped with state-of-the-art mercury controls. Duke
estimated that would drop emissions 90 percent, compared with older
plants.
George Everett, Duke's environmental affairs vice president, called
the rules a reasonable approach.
"We'll see how reasonable it is in 2013," he joked, referring to when
utilities have to file detailed plans describing controls they will
install at existing plants.
John Suttles of the Southern Environmental Law Center in Chapel Hill,
which pushed for tough restrictions, said the N.C. rules "should stand
among the strongest in the country."
Public concern and rapidly evolving technology to control mercury, he
said, led the commission to adopt rules that are stronger than earlier
state proposals and those the Bush administration enacted last year.
Because they use so much coal, power plants account for more than 70
percent of the state's mercury releases.
A study released this year by UNC Asheville researchers found that 15
percent of the 175 N.C. residents who volunteered for testing carried
potentially unhealthy mercury concentrations.
Charlotte's Todd Glasier, policy chair of the Carolinas Clean Air
Coalition, called Thursday's action "a compromise that strengthens the
(federal) mercury control legislation, but not to the extent that we had
hoped."
Glasier said the group had preferred a shorter deadline for pollution
controls to be in place at existing plants, as other states have done.
But he said he was pleasantly surprised that new plants would fall under
the rule as soon as 2007.
Unlike most states, North Carolina got a head start on mercury. Its
2002 Clean Smokestacks Act, adopted to reduce ozone- and haze- forming
pollutants from power plants, also removes mercury.
The 2002 act alone will reduce mercury emissions 74 percent by 2013,
the N.C. Division of Air Quality estimates.
Fish-Consumption Advice on the Web
North Carolina:
www.epi.state.nc.us/epi/ fish/safefish06.pdf
South Carolina:
www.scdhec.gov/water/fish/
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Visit http://www.powermarketers.com/index.shtml
for excellent coverage on your energy news front.
|