Cracks found at
nuclear station spell bad news for McConnell
Oct 17, 2006 - Scotsman, The
Author(s): Peter Macmahon Scottish Government Editor
JACK McConnell's hopes that he could rely on the extension of the
lives of Scotland's ageing nuclear reactors - and avoid sanctioning the
building of new nuclear power stations - suffered a major setback last
night.
The First Minister's plan to step up investment in renewable energy
while the lives of existing nuclear plants were extended was dealt a
blow after it was revealed there were serious cracks in boiler pipes at
the Hinkley Point plant in Somerset.
British Energy, which produces a fifth of the UK electricity, was
forced to admit the existence of the faults which were uncovered after
similar problems were revealed at the station's sister plant at
Hunterston, Ayrshire, earlier this year.
It was also forced to announce it was investigating "a significant
leak" in an underground cast-iron pipe in the cooling- water systems at
its nuclear station at Hartlepool.
Asked about any risks to public safety, a spokesman said the boiler
tubes were cracked and not leaking, and that water leaking from the
pipes in Hartlepool was "non nuclear".
The announcement, made to the stock exchange, sent British Energy
shares plummeting, but it also called into question Mr McConnell's hopes
of avoiding the politically controversial decision over new nuclear
power stations in Scotland.
The First Minister had let it be known that if the life of Hunterston
could be extended by ten years, as British Energy has claimed it could
be, there would be time for the Executive to boost investment in wind
and wave power.
However, the announcement that one of Hunterston's reactors would
have to be shut down for weeks, or possibly months, for repair, and the
other for inspection in April next year, calls that strategy into
question.
Professor Roger Crofts, who was secretary to the Royal Society of
Edinburgh's energy study, said last night: "It is OK for Mr McConnell
and others to say that you can run these stations for ten years more,
but when there are safety concerns, they have to be shut down and looked
at.
"We did not say they cannot have their lives extended, but the
principle is always that safety comes first and that will be what guides
the experts."
Mr McConnell's political opponents seized on the problems to demand
that he gave up on his hope of extending the lives of reactors in
Scotland.
Mark Ballard, a Green MSP, said: "The longer nuclear power stations
operate, the more expensive they are, and the greater the risks posed by
waste, faults and leaks. Jack McConnell can't get himself off the
nuclear hook by relying on extending the lives of these reactors. This
news shows Scotland needs to start planning now to deliver a
non-nuclear, low-carbon future."
But a spokesman for the First Minister said that regulation of the
safety of nuclear power stations was a matter for the UK government.
British Energy
said it had found that cracking at its Hinkley Point B R3 plant in
was "at the high end of the range previously experienced".
It said: "Whilst the level of boiler-tube cracking is not as
extensive as that at Hunterston B R3, the results indicate that early
inspections of Hunterston B R4 and Hinkley B R4 are required."
The Department of Trade and Industry stressed yesterday that the
reactor closures would not leave the country short of electricity. It
said: "The national grid is there to balance supply and demand. We would
expect the market to respond by bringing on other sources of generation
to fill this gap."
British Energy shares fell as low as 412p after the news, but
recovered slightly, to be 23.5 per cent lower at 428p.
© Copyright 2006 NetContent, Inc. Duplication and
distribution restricted.Please visit www.RenewableEnergyAccess.com
to respond to any particular article or for more great coverage on energy today!!
|