Western states want to expand their grid to improve
regional electrical reliability and make room for
renewable energy resources. Altogether, eight transmission
owners and operators have come together to provide a high
voltage backbone transmission system between Wyoming,
Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
It's no secret that America must modernize its grid.
New financial incentives provided by the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 do just that and have helped spur the announcement
of several new transmission projects. Raising capital for
such projects has always been a challenge. But an even
greater issue to expanding the overall grid is resistance
by neighborhood organizations and environmental groups.
"Historically, the development of electric transmission
has followed the announcement of new generating sources,"
says Doug Jaeger, vice president of transmission for Xcel
Energy that is part of the consortium. "We will develop a
proactive plan to create the robust infrastructure needed
to support renewable expansion and other generation
necessary for Colorado and the surrounding region."
During the past 10 years, investment in transmission by
all types of utilities averaged $3.6 billion per year,
says the Edison Electric Institute. In 2003 and 2004, the
number jumped to $5 billion each year. It says that such
investment could average $7 billion a year over the next
decade, or in a best-case scenario, $10 billion a year.
The 2005 energy law is giving utilities and their
investors more certainty. The law allows the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission to authorize a higher rate of
return on these regulated assets. The commission can
furthermore identify "national interest electric
corridors" -- pushing through those "vital" projects that
fail to win state approval after more than a year of
wrangling. And, if the process gets foiled in the court
system, the interested parties could petition the
president of the United States for approval.
Most regions around the country need additional
transmission to move electrons. In some cases, the move to
upgrade grids is being led by incumbent utilities that
serve growing territories and subsequently worry about
congestion that could hinder economic growth. In others,
it is the regional transmission organizations that operate
electric grids and schedule power deliveries that are
spurring development.
The New England ISO, for example, says that it has
given its OK to build more than five new lines while
California ISO says that $3.2 billion in transmission
projects have been approved since 1998, including Path 15,
all to alleviate the infamous bottleneck between southern
and northern California. The RTO, however, says that
getting new transmission built to accommodate cheaper
generation in the Southwestern U.S. is still problematic.
PJM, meantime, can also order transmission upgrades and as
such has authorized $1 billion since 1997 toward that
effort.
Proactive Regulation
Currently, the New York ISO is trying to identify how
much transmission capacity it will need between now and
2016. It expects generation and transmission on the
state's bulk electricity grid to be adequate through 2010.
Power deficiencies, primarily in the state's southeast
region, however, could occur by 2011 and become acute by
2016 if expected demand isn't addressed by then.
"Identifying those problems and rectifying them now
will help secure the reliable, safe supply of electricity
to satisfy the needs of all New York consumers today and
into the future," says Mark Lynch, CEO of the New York
ISO.
Without major upgrades to the state's electrical
infrastructure, increasing demand will inevitably reduce
reliability. In fact, the proposed 200-mile New York
Regional Interconnection project could be the first test
of the new energy law and whether FERC's backstop
authority is real.
Citizen groups and environmental organizations have
balked at the project, calling it a danger to the natural
habitat and a potential eyesore. Now, though, New York's
Public Service Commission has agreed to allow the
investor-led transmission group to perform additional
studies and analyses to come up with an alternative route
and provide more information on endangered species along
the line's path.
National Grid and Northeast Utilities, meantime, have
proposed the building of 80 to 100 miles of high-voltage
electric transmission lines at a cost of $1 billion in
southern New England. While local residents are concerned
about tall, unsightly towers, utilities have been able to
persuade state regulators of the need for more capacity.
Northeast Utilities, for example, is building a 69-mile
transmission line in Southwestern Connecticut while NStar
Electric is constructing an 18-mile line near Boston.
And west coast regulators are also being proactive. The
California Public Utilities Commission just approved
Southern California Edison's application to upgrade and
build new high-voltage transmission lines in northern Los
Angeles. The line will be capable of delivering up to
4,500 megawatts of electricity. It's all part of a
five-year plan in which the utility will spend
$4.3-billion on a transmission expansion program.
"The 'Tehachapi' project will strengthen and enhance
(our) transmission system by creating a new path for
renewable energy to meet the increasing electricity demand
of Southern California," says Ron Litzinger, senior vice
president of transmission and distribution for Southern
California Edison.
Without a doubt, the demand for power is growing around
the country, but the resources to deliver that electricity
are becoming inadequate. The risk of economic injury is
now running headfirst into fears of irreparable
destruction to the eco-system. The conflict must be
resolved if the grid is to be modernized. New federal
laws, in combination with better community outreach, are
designed to do just that.
More information is available from Energy Central:
Cracking the Bottlenecks - Act Spurs Buildup of
Transmission Corridors, EnergyBiz, Nov/Dec 2006
Building Tomorrow's Super Grid, EnergyBiz,
Sept/Oct 2006
Setting Grid Priorities, EnergyBiz, Sept/Oct
2005
Copyright © 1996-2006 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
|