De-Leveraging America

Location: New York
Author: IRA Staff
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2007
 

"The US economy remains strong."

Henry Paulson
Secretary of the Treasury

 


 

When the Fed announced a 50bp cut in the discount rate last week and also made a point of announcing an extension of the maturity of discount window loans to 30 days, our first reaction was to ask: Great, but what about next week? The troubles affecting the US markets are about solvency, not mere liquidity.

By the way, who told our former colleagues at the Fed that using the discount window is a badge of honor? Contrary to what you hear from the Fed, an institution openly using the discount window is unlikely to make investors feel more confident about the bank in question. Reports that Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB) availed itself of the Fed's generosity is reason for anxiety, not comfort, since it implies that the bank cannot fund itself in the private markets.

The last time the Fed faced a real credit crisis was the early 1990s, when the very solvency of some of the largest US banks was rightly in doubt. It has been that long since the US banking market worked through a true credit collapse. Today the numbers are bigger, the assets are increasingly opaque and illiquid, and the degree of leverage employed many times higher.

In the anxious days of zombie S&Ls and moral hazard, we used to wait eagerly on Friday mornings for the USPS mail to deliver the Fed's form H.4.1, “Factors Affecting Reserve Balance of Depository Institutions and Condition Statement of Federal Reserve Banks,” which among other things shows activity at the Fed's discount window.

Nothing of special note as of last Thursday, but this week's report will make a good read. Indeed, we predict that the venerable Fed document is going to become down right popular in the weeks ahead as analysts and even members of the banking public try to figure out whether their bank is financing assets at the Fed's discount window. A couple of research notes:

* First, the lead unit of JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) is now domiciled on Polaris Parkway in Cleveland, OH, so if you see a sudden surge in window activity in Chicago, don't assume it's a local bank gone bust.

* Likewise the lead unit of Citigroup (NYSE:C) is now domiciled on Paradise Road in Las Vegas, NV, so any surge in window activity at the San Francisco Fed should not necessarily be attributed to a local institution.

* The largest thrift unit of Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH) is located in Wilmington, DE, making the Philadelphia, PA, federal reserve bank the logical lender in the event. BTW, the ROE of the $20 billion asset Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB has almost converged with the peer group's high single digit ROE, this after peaking at 50 percent in Q1 2003. Call it a leading indicator.

As of last week, the Fed was offering 85 percent financing on "AAA" rated collateralized debt obligations or CDOs, paper which changes hands at half that rate over-the-counter, when it trades. This explicit bailout for the Street stands in stark contrast to the Darwinian struggle now underway in the real estate sector, where private loan originators are defaulting in droves. But the Fed may not escape loss itself as it bails out the major prime brokers.

Q: When was the last time that a federal reserve bank took a loss on a discount window loan?

Just consider what happens if an eligible depository institution repos "AA" rated CDO collateral to a reserve bank for 30 days, paper which has no market bid. Then imagine that the collateral is downgraded by a ratings agency. If the bank is unable to adjust the collateral value of the window borrowing, then the reserve bank might be forced to push the borrower into a prompt corrective action, sell the collateral into the market and take a hefty loss. A credit loss to a federal reserve bank is a public subsidy since it comes right out of the system's income and thus decreases the annual payment to the US Treasury.

The Fed's discount rate announcement came after Countrywide Financial (NYSE:CFC) disclosed that it is collapsing its non-conforming loan business and stuffing what remains into its federally insured bank unit. This kind of a nuclear winter survival strategy may be appropriate in the present environment -- especially with the Fed offering 30-day money at 5.75 percent on toxic waste.

The collapse of CFC's non-conforming mortgage production business signals the end of an asset class and an era in US real estate. As the dwindling ranks of mortgage brokers retreat away from loans (and customers) which are either too large or two risky to qualify for purchase by the GSEs, the entire stratosphere of residential real estate is suddenly standing on sand, wet sand with lots of warm salt water pulling it away with the retreating economic tide.

We look for the same price compression in the above $1 million residential real estate market as already is evident in the OTC market for CDOs and similar derivative instruments. A 25 percent haircut from the 2005-2006 peak seems like a conservative estimate. With the secondary market for non-conforming mortgage paper virtually disappearing, the only place prices on "jumbo" collateral seemingly can go is down.

Home price appreciation over the past decade was a function of ever expanding financing, thus no financing must imply a significant housing price correction from recent levels. We hear anecdotal reports of developers in Steamboat, CO, writing below market financing on condos and taking write-downs on the principal approaching 20 percent just in order to move inventory.

In view of the events in the credit markets over the past two weeks, just imagine how the economic reality of an imploding real estate market will be reflected in collateral prices a few months from now. Remember, home prices in areas like the Northeast and CA could drop 25 percent or more and long-term owners would still have positive appreciation. But if you bought in the past three years, you're probably under water right now.

Get used to having wet feet. And next week we look at the next shoe to drop off the centipede, namely unsecured consumer credit.

This briefing is provided as general information, and does not constitute definitive advice or recommendations. Any views expressed in the above articles are those of the author concerned and do not necessarily reflect the views of RiskCenter or any other party. RiskCenter has not independently verified any facts relied upon in any of the comments made in any of the articles referred to. Please send any comments or queries to info@institutionalriskanalytics.com. (www.institutionalriskanalytics.com)

To subscribe or visit go to:  http://www.riskcenter.com