Debate on nuclear power is cooling: Residents
are comfortable with the plant, calling it a "part of industry," but some
environmentalists say better options are available Dec 12 -
McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Danielle Zielinski Daily Press, Newport
News, Va.
At 11:10 a.m. today, 68 sirens in Williamsburg, Newport News, Surry, James
City County, York County and Isle of Wight will blare a steady three-minute
tone.
For many people within the 10-mile radius of the Surry Power Station, the
sound will be nothing more than a minor inconvenience. Others might tune in
to their local radio or television station for emergency information -- in
this case, for reassurance that it's only a test.
In the 35 years since the nuclear power plant was built on the south bank of
the James River, the sirens have become just another part of life in the
region. The quarterly exercise -- and an annual calendar sent out a few
weeks ago -- are the few reminders of the potential dangers that come with
nuclear energy, but residents aren't unaware.
"The reality is that if there is any major accident, there is nothing we can
do about it, really," said Judy Zwelling, a Williamsburg resident. "This
entire community would be destroyed if there was a nuclear accident. You
just can't live your life thinking that way if you're living here."
In the 1980s and early 1990s, Zwelling was an active member of
Williamsburg-based Citizen Action for a Safe Environment (CASE), a group
that opposed the Surry plant and wanted to see it shut down.
Now that Dominion Virginia Power is applying to build a new nuclear reactor
near its existing North Anna Power Station in Louisa County, familiar
concerns about nuclear power are resurfacing, along with changing attitudes
about its role as an energy source.
The safety of nuclear plants was a hotly debated issue in the 1980s
following the Three Mile Island disaster in Pennsylvania in 1979 and the
Chernobyl meltdown in Ukraine in 1986. Here in Hampton Roads, the Surry
plant also faced problems. In 1986, four workers died when steam pipes burst
at the plant, which also has been fined hundreds of thousands of dollars by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for safety violations.
Interest in and concerns about Surry rose again shortly after the 2001
terrorist attacks, when the local health department began distributing
potassium iodide pills to safeguard against thyroid cancer in the event of a
radiological release from the plant.
That program is still in existence -- the health department keeps a
stockpile of pills for everyone within a 10-mile radius in case of an
emergency -- but hasn't attracted widespread interest since it was first
announced.
"This has not been in the front of most people's minds," said Kevin Pearce,
an emergency planner with the Peninsula Health District.
Similarly, public hearings held after the annual emergency drills go
unattended, said Virginia Department of Emergency Management spokesman Bob
Spieldenner.
Rick Zuercher, a spokesman for Dominion, said nuclear plants' "stellar
safety record" over the past few decades has eased consumers' fears. Today,
he said, many people don't even remember Three Mile Island and Chernobyl,
and the use of radioactive material in other fields such as medicine is
commonplace.
Surry resident Bob Addison, who lived in the community even before the plant
was built, said its main effect has been a bigger tax base for the county.
Although he's never worked at the power station, he said he's confident in
its security measures and doesn't worry about a radiological release or
explosion.
"It's just part of industry," he said.
Several environmentalists, including Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore, have
come out publicly in favor of nuclear power as an alternative to fossil
fuels and a way to reduce greenhouse emissions. Zuercher said that a new
1,520 megawatt reactor, if built, would produce enough energy to power about
375,000 homes. Producing that power with nuclear instead of fossil fuels
would avoid the emission of 7.4 million tons of greenhouse gases per year,
the equivalent of taking 1.5 million cars off the road, he said.
"The world is beginning to see the need for reliable, safe sources of energy
that have a clean footprint," Zuercher said. "It's just really interesting
how the attitude about nuclear has changed."
An August 2007 study commissioned by the Nuclear Energy Institute, a
pro-nuclear policy organization, found that 82 percent of Americans living
within 10 miles of a nuclear plant favor nuclear energy, and 71 percent are
willing to see a new reactor built near them.
However, there already have been early challenges to Dominion's proposed
North Anna reactor, even though its NRC application likely will not be
completed until 2010.
People's Alliance for Clean Energy, an environmental group out of
Charlottesville, is opposing the new nuclear unit, saying that the existing
reactors have ecologically compromised Lake Anna in violation of the Clean
Water Act. Other conservation groups in the state also oppose the expansion
of nuclear facilities.
"Nuclear may not have the carbon emissions that a coal-powered plant has,
but I think it's disingenuous to call nuclear 'green' power," said Michael
Town, director of Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club.
Town said that nuclear energy is extremely expensive, and the mining and
enrichment of uranium is powered by fossil fuels.
Charlotte Davis, a sophomore at the College of William and Mary and a member
of the Student Environmental Action Coalition, said nuclear energy is not a
sustainable solution because of the nuclear waste created by the process.
Davis, Town and other Virginia environmentalists suggest that pursuing
energy efficiency measures and investing in alternative sources such as wind
and solar power would reduce the need for more nuclear reactors in the
state.
Zuercher said Dominion also supports water, wind, solar and renewable
energy, but that nuclear has to be there to provide a "baseload" of power.
The Surry and North Anna plants produce 34 percent of the electricity that
customers in Virginia use, he said.
For now, Surry is here to stay, after the NRC extended its operating license
until 2032 four years ago. That means that, like it or not, residents will
be hearing the sirens for at least another 25 years.
Jackie Deyarmon, who moved to Surry eight years ago, said she's concerned
about terrorism and gets nervous when her kids visit the plant on school
field trips. Is enough being done to keep locals safe?
"I hope so," she said. "When it comes to the power plant, I have to trust
God for protection." |