| Inquiry into a Proposed 137- Mile Powerline Has 
    Revealed a Huge Contrast in the Legal Costs of Both Sides  Dec 
    21 - Herald, The; Glasgow (UK)
 It was less of a high-voltage climax and more of a polite conclusion to the 
    public inquiry which will decide whether the proposed 137-mile powerline, 
    designed to run down the central spine of Scotland, will ever be built.
 
 Held in five different locations since February, the inquiry has followed 
    the Beauly-to-Denny route of the proposed pylons which have divided opinion 
    as much as they will physically split the country in two.
 
 From Inverness to Stirling - via the Cairngorms National Park and Perth - 
    arguments have been heard for and against the creation of a GBP30m Scottish 
    and Southern Energy powerline capable of transmitting an extra 2100 
    megawatts of wind-farm power through Scotland and towards its most 
    profitable market in England.
 
 While the proposals are welcomed by those in the energy industries, both in 
    Britain and Europe, they have been fiercely attacked by environmental and 
    community groups desperate to stop the perceived scarring of Scotland's most 
    cherished and beautiful places by 600 steel towers which are more than 200ft 
    tall.
 
 Dr Nicki Baker, of Friends of the Ochils, summed up the feelings of anti-powerline 
    protesters across Scotland yesterday, when she said: "It has been 
    exhausting. While the applicants have a team of advocates at their disposal, 
    we have been doing this in our own time and the expense of everything else 
    in our lives.
 
 "It has, of course, been a choice to do this and it has been done genuinely 
    out of a sense of civic duty. There has been massive public support for what 
    we have been doing. Without that, we wouldn't have been able to carry on.
 
 "We had pretty much put Christmas and everything else on hold, but now I 
    think we are just looking forward to a bit of a rest."
 
 While the appeal costs to applicants is said to run to GBP7m - a sum which 
    can largely be recouped from energy regulators - the cost of the campaign by 
    residents around Stirling alone has reached GBP50,000, a sum which has been 
    raised through race nights and minimum GBP2 donations to the "begging bowl".
 
 In the plush yet formal surrounds of the Golden Lion Hotel in Stirling, the 
    last day of the inquiry was reserved for the closing submissions of Scottish 
    and Southern Energy.
 
 It has also been a long haul for chief recorder Timothy Brian and his two 
    colleagues from the Scottish Government Directorate for Planning and 
    Environmental Appeals, who, over the course of the inquiry, have heard 300 
    witnesses and gathered 1000 pages of closing submissions.
 
 MrBrian, who himself had taken 2000 pages of notes since February, described 
    the inquiry in his closing statement as "uniquely challenging". Just moments 
    later, a slightly def lated festive balloon slowly fell from the ceiling to 
    the floor of the hotel ballroom.
 
 "I think that is almost a metaphor, " Mr Brian said.
 
 Submissions yesterday saw advocates for the power company clinically 
    dissect, deconstruct and almost completely disregard the arguments put 
    forward by campaigners against the pylons, some which were described as 
    "weak" and others "exaggerated".
 
 Impassioned calls against the powerline have been heard from those in and 
    around Stirling perhaps more than any other part of Scotland, as the the 
    powerline is to run across the land where the Battle of Sheriffmuir was 
    fought in November 1715 and obscure views of Wallace Monument from the 
    north.
 
 Advocates for the applicants fought yesterday to define the exact point 
    where the battle between the Jacobites and government forces began, the 
    power company preferring the theory that the battle started at a point now 
    covered by commercial forestry, with the pylons avoiding the spots where the 
    potential for human remains is at its highest.
 
 It was also proposed that a powerline route to the east of Stirling was 
    preferable to running it along the west, which would take pylons far closer 
    to Stirling Castle. Historic Scotland has agreed with this thesis, to the 
    point where the organisation was accused of "betrayal" by some anti-pylon 
    protesters.
 
 A similar application to put pylons on the Yorkshire Moors, which attracted 
    similar levels of controversy, ended in a compromise when underground cables 
    carried the power through the most sensitive areas in a bid to preserve 
    views and minimise their impact on the environment. Campaigners hope this 
    could set the precedent for the Denny-toBeauly proposals.
 
 Stirling Council, Scottish Natural Heritage, Stirling Before Pylons and 
    Stirling University came up with four alternatives to the pylons, which 
    would result in the cables being buried underground in certain locations.
 
 A report by ScottishPower Energy Networks has since put the cost of the 
    small sections of underground cable between GBP94m and GBP444m. It is 
    thought that a total underground approach to the powerline will cost 12 
    times as much as the overhead option.
 
 The final submissions on the alternatives were not presented to the inquiry 
    in time yesterday. They are due to be finalised today, with the final 
    decision of the public inquiry to be presented to Scottish ministers by the 
    end of 2008.
 
 The Beauly-Denny Landscape Group, a consortium of campaign groups headed by 
    Ramblers Scotland and John Muir Trust, has argued that there is no need for 
    the powerline at all, with a case put forward that the existing system can 
    cope if it is used more "intelligently".
 
 Davie Blackie, spokesman for the group, said: "This has been a tortuous 
    process.
 
 "We badly need an energy strategy for Scotland and fundamentally a strategy 
    for energy transmission, so we don't have to deal with this piecemeal 
    approach."
 
 FOR AND AGAINST
 
 FOR
 
 Scottish and Southern Energy. Wants the scheme to go ahead to transmit 
    Scotland's fast growing and highly profitable green energy sources.
 
 Mike Martin, Aberdeen Trades Union Council. He considers the power line as a 
    promotion of environmentally friendly energy sources * Mark Ruskell MSP, 
    pictured right. Would like to see part of the line go underground, but the 
    Green Party member sees it as a contribution to tackling climate change.
 
 Scottish Renewables, representative of 190 green organisations, feels the 
    upgrade is "vital" to keeping Scotland as a world leader in renewable 
    energy.
 
 AGAINST
 
 Dr Fiona Watson, TV historian and writer who described Stirling and its 
    surrounding area as a "theatre of war" which should be preserved Stirling 
    Before Pylons and Friends of The Ochils. Active members include 
    husband-and-wife team Dr Nicki Baker and Peter Pearson, who live in Logie.
 
 MSPs Keith Brown, Dr Richard Simpson, and George Reid, plus former MSP 
    Sylvia Jackson.
 
 Former Scotland Rugby international Kenny Logan, pictured left, whose family 
    have a farm in the shadows of the proposed route.
 
 Originally published by Newsquest Media Group.
 
 (c) 2007 Herald, The; Glasgow (UK). Provided by ProQuest Information and 
    Learning. All rights Reserved.
 |