Utilities are bustling. But the continued increase
in power demand also means the industry will have to
build new plants. And the demand for engineering,
procurement and construction services also translates
into higher capital costs -- a factor that could weigh
on their credit ratings if those expenses cannot be
passed through to their customers.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Standard & Poor's Ratings Service says that capital
costs are rising because the global demand for
infrastructure-related items is on the rise while
domestically, companies must invest in pollution control
equipment as well as new generation and transmission.
Altogether, the power industry has seen capital costs
for new generation climb by more than 50 percent in the
past three years.
"As a result, it is possible that with declining
reserve margins, utilities could end up building
generation at a time when labor and materials shortages
cause capital costs to rise, well north of $2,500 per
kilowatt for supercritical coal plants and approaching
$1,000 per kilowatt for combined-cycle gas turbines,"
writes Aneesh Prabhu, credit analyst for the ratings
agency, in a new report on the subject.
Regulated utilities will strive to get these higher
costs embedded in the rate structure and to do so in
pre-approved agreements with state utility
commissioners. Some states are already headed in that
direction, says Prabhu, although those regulators have
other forces pulling at them and can only bend so much.
Many are now reviewing rate hike requests so that the
price of power reflects the true costs of the underlying
commodities. Some are also coping with expiring rate
caps and nearly all are dealing with extensive spending
on environmental protections.
If those regulated companies have cost recovery
mechanisms, they can mitigate the major risks posed by
large-scale construction projects. However, they will
have to manage the overall risks during the construction
process to avoid cost overruns, says Prabhu. He points
to the Elm Road project being developed by Wisconsin
Energy and Madison Gas & Electric, which will have to
absorb the cost of some environmental compliance if they
can't keep them to what was agreed in the pre-approval
process. Other utilities, meanwhile, have chosen to
address these issues by jointly pooling their risks.
Unregulated generation companies can't pass through
to ratepayers the costs of their capital investment.
Instead, they must rely on market prices. Obviously,
those regions around the country experiencing the most
growth will fare the best.
S&P says that many of those "merchant" operations
will use project financed-debt, pointing to the 695
megawatt Longview plant being developed by GenPower and
First Reserve Corp., a global private equity firm.
Others will have to ensure that all of the planned
capacity is fully contracted before the first shovel
goes into the ground. That's what LS Power's Plum Power
project has done. The 665 megawatt pulverized coal plant
has an investment-grade bond rating.
Good Times
A lot of attention has been given to the nation's
bidding for limited natural resources such as oil and
natural gas. Less focus has been placed on the pressure
to acquire the hard assets needed to fuel power
production. China, for example, is estimated to account
for 40 percent of the world cement supply and 25 percent
of the global steel supply, all in 2005, according to
S&P. The effect: steel prices have risen 20 percent
since December 2005.
Meantime, labor costs are on the rise. Those expenses
are roughly double that of 2001, says S&P. It's largely
a function of the aging workforce whereby older and more
experienced skilled workers are retiring and are being
replaced with younger ones who do not have a depth of
knowledge. Productivity has therefore fallen.
"And it could get worse: In the engineering sector,
over 45 percent of labor will be eligible for retirement
over the next five years," says credit analyst Prabhu.
"At the same time, strong global labor construction
demand is leading to shortages of skilled labor,
especially in the energy sector, which threatens the
schedule and in-service dates of projects."
While the utility industry now has to deal with high
construction and labor costs, it is on the verge of boom
times. Credit upgrades outpaced downgrades by 2-to-1
last year. And this year, many major companies may
experience their biggest annual earnings growth in the
last 30 years. In fact, utility stock indices are
enjoying their best years in a long time and are
outpacing the S&P 500.
So power companies are well prepared to take on their
expected future outlays that include everything from
environmental compliance costs to those tied to
infrastructure and specifically transmission,
distribution and generation. Overall, interest rates are
low and banks have loosened their grip on the money,
although they have enhanced their due diligence.
Companies are also selling assets in an effort to keep
their debt-to-capitalization ratios in line and to
maintain investment-grade credit.
All told, infrastructure spending for both
transmission and generation has gone up about $6 billion
in the last year. Power supply shortages on the West
Coast and the New England region necessitate that even
more generation gets built, as well as the transmission
to accommodate that growth.
"The companies and the utility industry overall are
in good shape," says Barry Abramson, senior utilities
analyst for Gabelli & Co. in Rye, NY. "I'm not concerned
about a ramp up in capital spending. The industry really
has solid financials and there is also solid regulatory
support for these new investments."
Utilities are now the beneficiaries of good economic
times. But such prosperity has brought forth rising
capital costs. Companies are preparing for the
challenges and are taking concrete steps to mitigate
their risks.
Copyright © 1996-2006 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
|