Will nuclear energy's progression be slowed by an
inability to get uranium to feed the reactors? Some say
that underutilized mines have taken a toll and will lead
to hardship. Others disagree, saying that the mines can
gear up and the free market can respond to changing
conditions.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
A recent study by the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology says that the nuclear industry has lived off
commercial and government uranium inventories that are
nearly depleted. Globally, uranium production now meets
only 65 percent of current reactor requirements, which
has led to uranium prices rising from $7 a pound in 2000
to as much as $120 per pound just recently.
"Just as large numbers of new reactors are being
planned, we are only starting to emerge from 20 years of
underinvestment in the production capacity for the
nuclear fuel to operate them," Thomas Neff, a research
affiliate at MIT's Center for International Studies.
"There has been a nuclear industry myopia; they didn't
take a long-term view."
Current demand throughout the world is met by
accessing mines, using utility inventories and through
new fuel efficiencies that make plants more productive.
It's also met by decommissioning nuclear weapons. The
United States, for example, gets about half its uranium
from obsolete Russian nuclear missiles under a
non-proliferation nuclear treaty called
Megatons-to-Megawatts. That program ends in 2013.
But fears of global warming and projected fuel
shortages are propelling nuclear power forward after
nearly three decades of sitting on the sidelines.
Globally, the International Atomic Energy Agency is
predicting as many as 100 new reactors in 20 years,
causing the demand for uranium to rise 200 million
pounds to 240 million pounds, annually. The agency says
uranium resources are more than adequate to meet
projected requirements.
At the same time, newer technologies are emerging and
may allow spent fuel to be re-processed and then
re-used, all of which would prolong that time frame. And
advanced breeder reactors that are expected to be
commercially available within two decades are able to
produce as much fuel as they consume. They, furthermore,
use a different type of uranium than plants today and
one that is far more prevalent.
Much of the uranium used in this country is mined in
Australia, Canada and Nambia while small amounts are
derived in the western United States. But those foreign
sources will also get fully tapped by other nations --
China, India and Russia -- with aggressive nuclear
plans, says MIT. If the United States can even access
those supplies, it will pay high prices. "The take-home
message is that if we're going to increase the use of
nuclear power, we need massive new investments in
capacity to mine uranium and facilities to process it,"
says Neff.
Boom Times
There are several different forms of uranium. To
start a chain reaction in a nuclear reactor, the most
important one is uranium-235. But Neff points out that
current enrichment tools can only utilize a fraction of
the atoms in that particular kind of uranium after it is
mined. He says that new technology can be used to
recover slightly more, although it would not be enough
to meet expected future global demand.
The past may be catching up. Because the nuclear
industry has been sidelined for nearly three decades, so
too have the uranium mines used to supply its plants.
That sector was not helped when recent flooding caused
the "Cigar Lake" and "Ranger" mines to postpone millions
of pounds of production for a period.
Now, though, nuclear power seems to be in favor. But
Michael Winkler, an engineer with Schatz Energy Research
Center at Humboldt State University, says it will be
hard for the industry to live up to its promise. Within
50 years, he says that -- using current data -- the
demand for uranium will permanently outstrip current
supplies, causing prices to rise to a level not seen
before. If demand spikes, that time frame could come
sooner, he says.
There are larger quantities of low-grade ore that
could be used to fuel nuclear reactors, he adds. But
those sources would actually result in a net loss of
energy. Winkler adds that the reprocessing of spent fuel
and the pending breeder reactors that would upgrade to
Uranium-238, which is more abundant, are both "problem
plagued."
"Overall fuel supply is a serious problem for nuclear
energy," says Winkler. "Whether it can be solved in the
foreseeable future is not yet clear."
Others say that those concerns are unjustified. They
say that simple economics will prevail. That is, higher
prices will lead to more uranium production and an
ever-increasing level of investment flowing in. That, in
turn, will speed the development of newer and safer
mining techniques along with the introduction of modern
new reactors that can take advantage of other types of
uranium.
In this country, developers are gearing up for a
uranium boom. Thousands of drilling permits are in the
works in states such as Colorado, New Mexico, South
Dakota, Utah and Wyoming while the number of registered
producers in recent years has increased from just a
handful to several hundred. While current drilling
techniques are less disruptive than prior ones, local
residents oppose new mines because they say the process
pollutes local drinking water supplies.
Any nuclear revival might be threatened by an
inability to extract enough uranium to feed future
demand. While there's disagreement as to whether current
supplies of uranium are adequate to meet present
production levels, there is no argument that the market
will tighten. If markets can respond and commercialize
new fuel and reactor technologies while perfecting
mining processes, nuclear energy may rise to the
occasion.
More information is available from Energy Central:
The Rebirth of Nuclear, EnergyBiz, May/June
2007
For more on this topic, visit the Energy Central
Generation Technologies Topic Center.
Copyright © 1996-2006 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
|