Compromise on CAFE standards

 

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Democrat-Nevada told reporters on June 21 that he would not allow the derailment of the tax package to sink the overall bill, even as he excoriated Republicans for "pandering to the big oil and energy companies." But it remained unclear if the bill would pass at that point, because some lawmakers continued to object to the section of the legislation that sought to raise Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for cars and trucks.

The bill will achieve serious savings for oil ... and put money back in the pockets of American consumers.
--Senator Dianne Feinstein

The original bill language would have boosted CAFE standards for both cars and trucks to 35 miles per gallon by 2020, a significant increase from the current fleet average of 25 mpg that has existed since the mid-1970s. But the original provision would have also mandated an additional 4% increase every year between 2021 and 2030, which the auto industry -- as well as Michigan's two Democratic senators, Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow -- vigorously opposed.

Levin, Stabenow and other several other senators crafted a less-stringent plan that would have required cars to get 36 mpg by 2022, while trucks would have to achieve only 30 mpg by 2025. There were no additional increases in subsequent years under the Levin/Stabenow plan. But the Democratic leadership refused to endorse the approach, saying it was too weak to force much-needed changes on US automakers, which have lost billions of dollars in recent years because of lagging sales of gas-guzzling pickup trucks and SUVs.

But the CAFE roadblock was resolved on the afternoon of June 21, when a host of senators from both sides of the aisle hammered out a compromise amendment that stuck a middle ground between the original bill language and the Levin plan. The compromise, which was spearheaded by Republican Ted Stevens of Alaska and Democrat Thomas Carper of Delaware, requires both cars and trucks to achieve an average of 35 mpg by 2020, but there is no hard and fast requirement for further increases beyond that point.

"The bill will achieve serious savings for oil ... and put money back in the pockets of American consumers," said Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat-California, who helped broker the compromise.

The CAFE provision will reduce US oil consumption by as much as 2.5 million barrels per day by 2025, senators involved in the compromise said. That could save US consumers nearly $100 million in gasoline costs, they said.

Notably, the CAFE compromise was rolled into the underlying bill in a very unusual fashion, as the Senate adopted the measure by voice vote and without a word of debate on the Senate floor. Some senators only learned of the move when Senator John Kerry, Democrat-Massachusetts, announced it at a press conference that was being held just off the floor. "It's a done deal," Kerry announced, sending some senators and reporters scrambling for the exits.

Reid to GOP: "Cool the jets"

Still, final passage of the bill was nearly derailed in the eleventh hour when Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat-North Dakota, took to the floor and declared that Democrats would reinstate the tax package in a forthcoming conference committee with the House, which is necessary before the Senate legislation can be sent to President Bush for his signature.

"That created a considerable amount of angst on this side of the aisle," said Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader. "There was substantial opposition to this massive tax increase which would have been added to the bill."

That forced Reid into damage-control mode, as the Democratic leader called on Republicans to "relax" and "cool the jets" on the issue. Reid narrowly succeeded, as 62 senators -- just two more than were required under Senate rules -- voted to end debate on the bill. Eighteen Republicans joined that cause, while six Democrats -- including Levin and Stabenow, who did not support the CAFE compromise language -- voted against cloture. Levin and Stabenow also voted against final passage of the bill, as did Landrieu.

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the industry's main trade group, issued a statement commending Levin, Stabenow and other senators "who worked to eliminate provisions of concern in the energy bill." But the alliance made it clear that it was not happy with the more stringent CAFE provision that was ultimately passed in the final bill.

"This is a long process, and we are continuing to work constructively to develop reasonable fuel economy standards that are affordable and preserve the cars and light trucks that farmers, tradesmen, business owners, outdoor enthusiasts and families need every day," the group said.