Congress moves forward with climate change talks
Nov. 1Even though it squeaked through by one vote instead of roaring by
with a unanimous tally, Congress´s first global climate change bill
nevertheless officially moved beyond the discussion stage this morning.
A seven-member panel chaired by Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., voted 4-3 to
bump what´s officially known as America´s Climate Security Act of 2007
forward to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. That
committee, chaired by Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., has scheduled a Nov. 8
hearing about the bill.
"Today is a landmark day," a relieved Boxer said after the close vote. "This
is an issue that cannot wait. The market is waiting for a signal. Today we
sent a signal."
After engaging in a 2.5-hour session of dueling amendments, both Sens. John
Barrasso, R-Wyo., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., voted against the bill.
Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia joined them with a "no" vote.
In addition to Lieberman, the other three members of the Private Sector and
Consumer Solutions to Global Warming and Wildlife Protection Subcommittee
voting for the bill were Sens. Max Baucus, D-Mont., Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.,
and John Warner, R-Va., who was unable to attend the meeting because he was
hospitalized.
The bill co-sponsored by Lieberman and Warner to tame carbon dioxide and
five other planet-warming gases has undergone several facelifts since first
being introduced in early August. It made its environment subcommittee debut
Oct. 24.
"If passed it would put forth the strongest global warming control law in
the world," Lieberman said in emphasizing the urgency of moving forward. "It
inevitably doesn´t satisfy everybody´s desire for what a climate change bill
should look like."
The almost economy-wide measure introduces a cap-and-trade system covering
electric power, transportation and manufacturing. Those sectors account for
75 percent of the nation´s emissions of heat trapping gases. The natural gas
sector is also now required to reduce its emissions.
Caps would begin at the 2005 emissions level in 2012, dropping to or below
1990 levels in 2020 before falling 63 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
Initially, pollution credits would be both given away and auctioned. A 100
percent auction system would be established by 2036. The bill also
strengthens energy efficiency standards for residential boilers as well as
commercial and residential buildings.
The bill also gives Congress a the ability to tighten emissions caps if
scientific models suggest adjustments are necessary.
"We have a basic duty to leave this planet to our children in better shape
than we found it," said Baucus, a coal-state Democrat whose support is
crucial to the bill´s passage. Global warming threatens Montana´s heritage
by causing drought and warm trout streams, he added. "This bill will make
the United States a leader."
"We will never achieve perfection," Lautenberg said. "The question à that
arises here à is not whether it´s going to cost more à but what´s the cost
of life. We´re talking about everybody´s grandchildren."
Between them, Barrasso, who represents a coal state, and Sanders, an
advocate for renewable energy and stricter emissions standards, introduced
16 amendments Thursday.
Senators adopted two of Barrasso´s minor amendments on separate voice votes.
It rejected several, including one that would "sunset" the climate change
bill five years after it passed.
The panel was no kinder to Sanders. Members passed just one of his eight
amendments. That one requires the auto industry to produce vehicles with 35
mph fuel economy to qualify for money distributed by the pollution credit
auction.
Though Lautenberg supported Sanders on each vote, the other senators
rejected his attempts to: immediately direct $324 billion from the zero and
low carbon energy technologies program toward renewables to match the
dollars going toward research in clean coal and carbon sequestration; stop
"corporate welfare" by giving $232 billion in auction revenues to a block
grant programs for state, tribal and local governments instead of the
automobile industry; move the pollution credit auction date from 2036 to
2026; halt the start-up of any coal-fired electricity plant until it can
sequester at least 85 percent of its carbon dioxide; limit annual offsets
among the covered sectors to 420 million metric tons; and reduce overall
emissions 80 percent below 2005 levels by 2050.
"This is not old-fashioned politics," Sanders said in response to senators
who complimented his passion. "This is chemistry, this is physics, this is
science. The issue that we´re dealing with is not passion."
"These are not some radical, wild-eyed ideas," the Vermonter said about
cutting emissions more rapidly. "These goals are conservative. We have got
to act boldly."
In a news release distributed at Thursday´s meeting, the National Wildlife
Federation said the bipartisan vote puts Congress in the hot seat.
"The clock is ticking, and too many members of Congress have been asleep at
the wheel," NWF wrote in the statement. "This vote is a wake-up call."
"There´s a lot of good faith all around," Lieberman said about the path his
bill eventually takes. "Everybody here wants to do something. The
differences are how we do it."
To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.wastenews.com
|