Mixing Mexico's Energy Policies
November 14, 2007
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief
Things are looking up south of the border. But restrictive policies in the
electricity and natural gas sectors still hamper growth in Mexico.
Over the past 20 years, Mexico has made great strides reducing trade
barriers and thereby allowing more private investment. While its current
gross domestic product is growing annually at 4.8 percent, it still needs to
enact more regulatory reforms to lift per capita GDP growth, raise living
standards and reduce poverty at a quicker rate, says the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development.
Unlike the nation's oil industry, the power sector there is partially open
to foreign investment. It's a policy that began in the 1980s and one that
was expanded under former President Vicente Fox. The same policy is
continuing with its current leader, Felipe Calderon. But, the country will
need 27,000 megawatts of new capacity over the next decade if it is to meet
the projected electricity demand, officials from the Commission Federal de
Electricidad (CFE) say. That will entail an investment of $50 billion.
Right now, Mexico has an installed capacity of nearly 52,000 megawatts.
About 11,500 of that total, or 23 percent, are owned by alternative
suppliers. In a Dow Jones story, Jaime de la Rosa, President of the Mexican
Energy Association, says that a more liberalized state-owned CFE would
attract private investors. He notes that Spain's Gas Natural SDG SA just
acquired five gas-fired power plants with a capacity of 2,233 megawatts.
But, de la Rosa would like to see private sector generation eventually rise
from 23 percent today to 40 percent of CFE's total capacity.
While past economic reforms have borne fruit, Mexico still is far behind the
world's developed nations in terms of living standards. Per capita income is
a quarter that of the United States. To lessen that gap, it will have to do
more to increase free trade and to improve its transportation and energy
infrastructure. As it now stands, competition is still restricted. This is
particularly true in the natural gas and electricity industries.
"Although its fiscal GDP is good, Mexico has to reduce the heavy reliance of
the budget on oil revenue," says the organization of developed countries.
"Furthermore, living standards remain well below those in other (developed)
countries, and current GDP growth is still not high enough to ensure rapid
convergence."
Right Balance
Altogether, Mexico has 12 free trade agreements with more than 40 countries
-- a good foundation, but the nation still has many challenges: upgrading
infrastructure, modernizing its tax system and labor laws, and allowing
private investment in the energy sector. Toward that end, the organization
says that the overall objective in the electricity sector is to strengthen
the incentives to invest in generation and transmission to keep pace with
expected future demand and to create a reliable supply of lower-cost energy.
To get there, the organization says that generation should be functionally
separate from transmission. Under such a regulatory regime, an independent
system operator would direct the flow of power over the transmission lines.
The end product would mean that the state-owned enterprise could favor its
own supply over that of competitors. Basically, alternative suppliers could
move their electrons freely over the wires infrastructure, ultimately
creating competition, better services and fairer prices.
The case for reform is clear. The state-owned CFE needs an annual cash
infusion of $5 billion over the next decade, all to accommodate an expected
growth in power demand of 5 percent annually. The government there can't
help much, as it already has a foreign debt burden of $76 billion. "The
possibility of opening generation to private investors while maintaining the
transmission and distribution businesses in government hands sounds like the
most probable one," says a report published by Standard & Poor's Rating
Service.
The solution, though, is not as easy it may sound. All across Latin America,
citizens are mistrustful of privatization. In the 1990s, promises were made
only to go unfulfilled. The end result, in many cases, was higher energy
costs, albeit many of the regulatory schemes were ill-conceived or moved to
liberalize too rapidly.
Government-run enterprises, however, have fared even worse. They have shown
themselves to be bureaucratic and laden with inefficiencies. While
state-owned industries are concerned with keeping prices low, they have
worked to inhibit private investment and have therefore prevented the
modernization of their infrastructures. Simply, investors seek returns,
which means that price of power would have to reflect the true cost of
production. Absent that, they must continue to subsidize its electricity
industry. In most cases -- as it is in Mexico -- they can no longer afford
to do so.
The goal is to increase living standards without alienating the Mexican
population. To that end, the country needs a cleaner and modern
infrastructure to meet future energy demand. The right mix in the power
sector may be to allow foreign ownership in some areas but maintain
government control in others. It's a balancing act and one that would have
to be gradually implemented. The progress that started in the 1980s, though,
has to be taken to a new level now.
Copyright © 1996-2006 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.
|