Rich Must Bear Climate Change Costs - Report
UK: November 12, 2007
LONDON - The rich caused the problem and must therefore pay the price of
fixing the global climate change crisis, a new report said on Monday.
Christian Aid, an agency of British and Irish churches, said industrialised
nations were historically responsible and therefore morally liable to foot
the multi-billion dollar cost of tackling the problem of man-made emissions
of carbon gases.
"Nations that have grown rich in part by polluting without facing the costs
of doing so must now repay their carbon debt to the developing world," said
Andrew Pendleton, author of "Truly Inconvenient - tackling poverty and
climate change at once".
It is an argument that will appeal to the developing nations which have used
it regularly, but will probably meet diplomatic foot-dragging in the
industrialised world whose economies are being threatened by surging oil
prices.
Based on the Greenhouse Development Rights framework -- an equation
allocating responsibility for emissions of greenhouse gases -- the United
States should shoulder 34.3 percent of the annual bill, with the European
Union on 26.6 percent.
India and China, both rapidly industrialising but still way behind their
developed world counterparts, should bear 0.3 percent and 7.0 percent of the
bill respectively.
Based on the calculation a year ago by British economist Nicholas Stern that
acting now would cost one percent of gross world product a year,
Washington's bill would be US$212 billion a year while Brussels' would be
US$164 billion, the report said.
The report is aimed directly at a meeting next month of United Nations'
environment ministers on the Indonesian island of Bali which
environmentalists want to agree to open urgent talks on a new global climate
protocol.
The Kyoto Protocol requires industrialised nations to cut carbon gases by
five percent on average below 1990 levels in the period 2008-2012 when it
expires, with as yet nothing in prospect to replace it.
But the United States rejected it in 2002 as being economic suicide and it
is not binding on developing countries such as China which is building a
coal-fired power station a week to feed its booming economy. (Reporting by
Jeremy Lovell; Editing by Giles Elgood)
Story by Jeremy Lovell
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
|