Wildfire Drives Carbon Levels In Northern
Forests
11/6/2007 Madison
Far removed from streams of gas-thirsty cars and pollution-belching
factories lies another key player in global climate change. Circling the
northern hemisphere, the conifer-dominated boreal forests - one of the
largest ecosystems on earth - act as a vast natural regulator of atmospheric
carbon levels.
Forest ecologists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison are studying how
environmental factors such as forest fires and climate influence carbon
levels in this forest system. Their most recent findings, reported in the
Nov. 1 issue of the journal Nature, offer insight into the balance of carbon
uptake and release that contribute to atmospheric carbon dioxide levels
worldwide.
Second in size among forests only to the tropical rainforests, the boreal
forests form a massive green band spanning the higher latitudes of Canada,
Alaska, Siberia, China, and Scandinavia. Their sheer size, coupled with the
fact that they are expected to experience the greatest warming of any forest
biome as global temperatures rise, means that climate-related changes here
are likely to resonate well beyond the forest boundaries, says S. Tom Gower,
UW-Madison professor of forest ecology and management and primary
investigator of the project.
In the new study, Gower and his colleagues used a computer model to simulate
the carbon balance of one million square kilometers of the Canadian forest
over the past 60 years, to determine the relative impacts of climate and
disturbance by wildfire.
The group found that the effects of carbon dioxide and climate - temperature
and precipitation - varied from year to year but generally balanced out over
time and area. Instead, forest fires during the 60-year period had the
greatest direct impact on carbon emissions from the system.
However, "because fire frequency and fire intensity are directly controlled
by climate change, it doesn't mean that we shouldn't be focusing on climate
change," Gower says. "Climate change is what's causing the fire changes.
They're very tightly coupled systems."
The researchers believe that fires shift the carbon balance in multiple
ways. Burning organic matter quickly releases large amounts of carbon
dioxide. After a fire, loss of the forest canopy can allow more sun to reach
and warm the ground, which may speed decomposition and carbon dioxide
emission from the soil. If the soil warms enough to melt underlying
permafrost, even more stored carbon may be unleashed.
A trend toward hotter and drier conditions is likely to exacerbate the
effects of fire by increasing the frequency, intensity, and size of burns.
"All it takes is a low snowpack year and a dry summer," Gower says. "With a
few lightning strikes, it's a tinderbox."
Historically, scientists believe the boreal forest has acted as a carbon
sink, absorbing more atmospheric carbon dioxide than it releases, Gower
says. Their model now suggests that, over recent decades, the forest has
become a smaller sink and may actually be shifting toward becoming a carbon
source.
"The soil is the major source, the plants are the major sink, and how those
two interplay over the life of a stand really determines whether the boreal
forest is a sink or a source of carbon," he says.
Though the model is not currently designed to forecast future conditions,
Gower says, "Based on our current understanding, fire was a more important
driver (of the carbon balance) than climate was in the last 50 years. But if
carbon dioxide concentration really doubles in the next 50 years and the
temperature increases 4 to 8 degrees Celsius, all bets may be off."
SOURCE: University of Wisconsin-Madison |