Egypt Plan to Green Sahara Desert Stirs Controversy
EGYPT: July 9, 2007
CAIRO - It looks like a mirage but the lush fields of cauliflower, apricot
trees and melon growing among a vast stretch of sand north of Cairo's
pyramids is all too real -- proof of Egypt's determination to turn its
deserts green.
While climate change and land over-use help many deserts across the world
advance, Egypt is slowly greening the sand that covers almost all of its
territory as it seeks to create more space for its growing population.
Tarek el-Kowmey, 45, points proudly to the banana trees he grows on what was
once Sahara sands near the Desert Development Centre, north of Cairo, where
scientists experiment with high-tech techniques to make Egypt's desert
bloom.
"All of this used to be just sand," he said. "Now we can grow anything."
With only five percent of the country habitable, almost all of Egypt's 74
million people live along the Nile River and the Mediterranean Sea. Already
crowded living conditions -- Cairo is one of the most densely populated
cities on earth -- will likely get worse as Egypt's population is expected
to double by 2050.
So the government is keen to encourage people to move to the desert by
pressing ahead with an estimated US$70 billion plan to reclaim 3.4 million
acres of desert over the next 10 years. Among the incentives are cheap
desert land to college graduates.
But to make these areas habitable and capable of cultivation, the government
will need to tap into scarce water resources of the Nile River as rainfall
is almost non-existent in Egypt.
The plan has raised controversy among some conservationists who say turning
the desert green is neither practical nor sustainable and might ultimately
backfire.
Anders Jagerskog, director of the Stockholm International Water Institute in
Sweden, questions the wisdom of using precious water resources to grow in
desert areas unsuited to cultivation and where water will evaporate quickly
under the scorching sun.
"A desert is not the best place to grow food," he said. "From a political
perspective, it makes sense in terms of giving more people jobs even though
it is not very rational from a water perspective," he added.
REGIONAL TENSION?
The scope of the reclamations could also add to regional tension over Nile
water sharing arrangements as in order to green its desert Egypt might need
to take more than its share of Nile water determined by international
treaties.
Egypt's project to reclaim deserts in the south, called "Toshka", would
expand Egypt's farmland by about 40 percent by 2017, using about five
billion cubic metres of water a year.
That worries neighbours to the south who are already unhappy about Nile
water sharing arrangements. Under a 1959 treaty between Egypt and Sudan,
Egypt won rights to 55.5 billion cubic metres per year, more than half of
the Nile's total flow.
Ethiopia, where the Blue Nile begins, receives no formal allocation of Nile
water, but it is heavily dependent on the water for its own agricultural
development in this often famine ravaged country.
"The Toshka project will complicate the challenge of achieving a more
equitable allocation of the Nile River with Ethiopia and the other Nile
basin countries ," said Sandra Postel, director of the US-based Global Water
Policy Project.
"Egypt may be setting the stage for a scenario that's ultimately detrimental
to itself."
But other experts suggest that in the delicate arena of water politics, it
may be more of an imperative for Egypt's government to mollify its own
population rather than heed its neighbours concerns.
Overcrowding is straining infrastructure in the cities and the government is
worried that opposition groups such as the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood,
which has a fifth of the seats in Parliament, might capitalise on
discontent.
"The government feels it needs to reduce the number of people in high
density areas, which puts a lot of pressure on resources like fertile land,"
said Mostafa Saleh, professor of ecology at Al Azhar University in Cairo.
"They are trying to spread the population to other parts of the country."
DESERT TOURISM
Some critics say that Egypt should look at desert tourism rather than
agriculture, which might not be sustainable or particularly profitable and
could destroy fragile wildlife habitats that might otherwise be a drawcard
for tourists.
A desert reclamation project last decade, south of Cairo, destroyed much of
the Wadi Raiyan oasis and its population of slender horned gazelles.
"The price tag on these assets is huge, both as natural heritage and as a
resource for tourism," said ecologist Saleh.
Saleh is vice president of an Egyptian firm that built an electricity-free
ecolodge, consisting of rock salt and mud houses, amid olive and palm groves
in the desert oasis of Siwa.
The lodge, which costs US$400 per night and has attracted guests such as
Britain's Prince Charles and Belgium's Queen Paola, shows that the desert
would be better used for ecotourism than farming, he says.
"In Egypt, water is the most critical resource and we should be careful to
use it to maximise revenue," Saleh explained. "Agriculture is not the best
option for Egypt. Nature-based tourism could bring in much more money."
At the Desert Development Center, irrigation water comes through a canal
connected to the Nile, about 15 km (nine miles) away, where it is used to
keep crops flourishing and grass green for hardy hybrid cows to graze.
Experts at the centre believe greening the Sahara might be Egypt's best hope
of bringing prosperity to its people.
Workers graft fruit-bearing plants onto the stems of plants that survive
well in the desert. Favourite fruits are citrus as they flourish in hot
climates and can land on supermarket shelves in Europe hours after
harvesting.
Proximity to markets in Europe and a lack of pests, which usually thrive in
humid environments, make desert farming economically viable, said Richard
Tutwiler, director of the Desert Development Center at the American
University in Cairo.
Water supply, Tutwiler said, shouldn't be an issue at least for the next ten
years. It makes sense, he says, to expand agriculture onto land that was
once useless.
"There is no frost and there is sun all the time here," he said. "Plants
just go nuts."
Story by Will Rasmussen
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
|