Great Falls Coal Plant to Move Forward
Oct 12 - Missoulian
A proposed coalfired power plant that would provide electricity for at least
60,000 people in central and south-central Montana doesn't need financing
help from the city of Great Falls to succeed, its developer said this week.
"If (Great Falls) doesn't get it all together. we're just going to move
forward," said Tim Gregori, general manager for Southern Montana Electric
Generation and Transmission Cooperative.
Gregori's comments come as Great Falls' municipal utility, a partner in the
250-megawatt power plant, tries to rustle up enough customers to cover its
15 percent share of plant construction costs.
The city believes it has until Oct. 1 to woo additional electric customers
away from NorthWestern Energy, the state's largest private electric utility'
The city's nonprofit utility also can sign up, at any time, new industrial
customers who aren't buying power from NorthWestern at regulated rates.
"Offers are being made to potential customers," Great Falls City Manager
John Lawton said, "They have to assess their risk with us versus their risk
of staying with (NorthWestern). That's a business decision for them."
Missoula and Helena both opted not to buy power from Great Falls, citing
concerns about the plans for the coal plant. Missoula's decision earlier
this month came only after a public outcry against the city's preliminary
decision to sign a deal with Great Falls.
Southern Montana Electric (SME) is developing the plant near Great Falls as
a source of power for five rural electric cooperatives that are its members.
The co-ops deliver power to 60,000 to 70,000 people in rural and suburban
areas that stretch from Lewistown to the Wyoming border.
The co-ops have a major supply contract that begins to expire next year. The
plant wouldn't be completed until 2011 or 2012.
The city of Great Falls, also a member of SME, has planned to finance 15
percent of the plant, reserving that power for sale through its nonprofit
utility, Electric City Power.
The city's utility already is buying power from SME and reselling it to
local commercial customers, such as the Great Falls School District and the
Montana Refining Co. refinery. SME is buying that power under a contract
with power generator PPL Montana.
But the city needs to line up these same customers and more for the long
term, before it can finance 15 percent of the plant construction. The entire
plant is projected to cost $670 million to $720 million.
Lawton said the city's nonprofit, publicly owned utility can provide
long-term competition to Northwestern, by offering power at the cost of
production.
"We think we can beat what they may (offer) over the long term," he said.
Gregori said the city of Great Falls has been "an important contributor" to
the development of the proposed plant, known as the Highwood Generating
Station.
But plant development will proceed if Great Falls doesn't line up enough
customers to finance 15 percent of the construction costs, he said.
The size of the plant can be adjusted to 215 megawatts, which is the amount
of power the five rural electric co-ops will need, Gregori said.
"Whether (Great Falls) has 15, 10 or five megawatts doesn't reflect on the
viability of the plant," he said. "Whatever their load is, we'll meet it."
Great Falls has until Oct. 1 to attract NorthWestern customers because of a
law passed by the 2007 Legislature, limiting competition for those
customers.
Northwestern, which serves about 320,000 electric customers in Montana,
pushed for the law, saying it was needed to shore up NorthWestern's customer
base so the utility could build new power plants to serve those customers.
The bill was pitched as utility "re-regulation," allowing NorthWestern to
own power plants that would provide a dedicated, regulated source of
electricity for its customers. NorthWestern owns virtually no power
production and must buy electricity for its customers on the open market at
nonregulated prices.
Claudia Rapkoch, a spokeswoman for NorthWestern, said the company is
evaluating how it might build 120 to, 180 megawatts of power production, and
is looking at a gas-fired plant.
The Highwood Generating Station also faces opposition from one of the
state's leading environmental groups, the Montana Environmental Information
Center (MEIC), which is opposed to coal-fired plants that will contribute to
global warming.
MEIC has challenged the plant's air-quality permit and is closely watching
zoning changes that are needed to allow construction of the plant.
Copyright The Missoulian Sep 12, 2007
(c) 2007 Missoulian. Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning. All
rights Reserved. |