Utilities Plan for Future Without Coal
Oct 12 - The Daily Oklahoman
It's back to the planning room for the state's largest electric utilities.
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Co., Public Service Co. of Oklahoma and the
Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority officially scrapped plans for their
proposed $1.87 billion coal-fired power plant near Red Rock after the
Oklahoma Corporation Commission on Thursday refused to allow OG&E and PSO to
recover construction costs before the facility becomes operational.
"We continue to believe that a jointly-owned Red Rock plant represented a
unique opportunity for three Oklahoma utilities to maintain a balanced
generation portfolio and hold down future energy costs," said Pete Delaney,
OGE Energy Corp.'s chairman, president and chief executive officer.
"Unfortunately, as we said consistently throughout this process, it is not
feasible to construct a plant of this size without the commission's
blessing. We will now turn our attention to developing alternative, albeit
less attractive, baseload generation options."
The utilities repeatedly have said the Red Rock plant was the least
expensive option. Plant opponents, however, say the commission's decision
likely will save Oklahoma consumers money.
"We think for customers this is a big win," Assistant Attorney General Bill
Humes said. "They said the Red Rock plant was the least expensive
alternative, but they could never conclusively prove that. There was a great
deal of testimony to the contrary. The sad fact is they never presented to
the commission the cost of a second alternative."
The Oklahoma Corporation Commission voted 2-1 Thursday to refuse preapproval
for the proposed 950-megawatt coal-fired power plant near Red Rock.
Commissioners Jeff Cloud and Jim Roth voted to deny preapproval of the
plant. Commissioner Bob Anthony did not sign the order, but issued a
separate opinion agreeing in part and disagreeing in part.
Anthony agreed with the other two commissioners that PSO needs 450 megawatts
of new baseload capacity and OG&E needs 300 megawatts by 2012. He also
agreed on the need for consumer protections and demand of energy efficiency
programs.
The commissioner said he voted against denying the applications because
"only in the years to come will we know for sure whether a coal plant or
gas-fired facility would have provided Oklahoma the cheapest baseload
electric power for the next few decades."
He pointed out the administrative law judge found that nominal savings to
ratepayers over a 40-year project life would be $5.5 billion.
Besides cost issues, Red Rock opponents also said the coal plant would be
too dirty and that state utilities should use Oklahoma natural gas rather
than Wyoming coal.
"This decision will give us all an opportunity to look to find a better,
more environmentally friendly answer for the energy needs in the state,"
said Tom Price Jr., senior vice president of corporate development at
Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp. Chesapeake was one of the most
vocal members of the Quality of Service Coalition, which challenged the
plant at the corporation commission and the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
All three corporation commissioners said Thursday the utilities have a
legitimate need for more power generation and invited the companies to
return to the commission with a future plan.
"Because this decision is not a surprise, we've been focused already on how
to meet the generation needs we're going to have," Public Service Company of
Oklahoma spokesman Stan Whiteford said. "We're focused on meeting that need
and determining how best to go about that. There are a lot of alternatives
out there. It would be speculative to say which way might go on that, but we
already have our leadership team looking at that."
The utilities likely also will return to the commission to ask if they may
recover costs of the design and development phase of the project. Delaney
said OG&E will ask to pass the $18 million to $20 million price tag onto
customers. PSO has not yet determined whether it will try to recover its
costs.
The company did not say how much it spent, but Anthony estimated the total
price tag to be about $50 million.
-----
To see more of The Oklahoman, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to
http://www.newsok.com .
Copyright (c) 2007, The Oklahoman
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. |