Winning permission to build natural gas pipelines is
a tough job. It's designed that way. And while it is an
inclusive process, it is not intended to be an
impossible one. Success means being open and flexible
and able to anticipate future needs.
|
Ken Silverstein
EnergyBiz Insider
Editor-in-Chief |
Natural gas demand is expected to climb 12 percent
over the next decade. More pipelines must therefore be
constructed and new development could be lucrative with
prices in the $6 to $8 per million BTUs. But, the
quandary facing pipeline developers is that natural gas
producers are complaining that they are not getting
access to gas-rich areas. That makes it impossible to
take a proactive position and start laying additional
pipelines.
Altogether, the demand for electricity is expected to
rise about 2 percent a year for the foreseeable future.
All sorts of new infrastructure will be required,
including 38,000 miles of natural gas pipelines and
225,000 miles of distribution lines, says the Bush
administration. Right now, natural gas comprises about
15 percent of the country's electricity demand. Despite
the depletion of existing wells and the difficulty
winning access to restricted areas, natural gas is
expected to take on a larger role.
"While gas produced in traditional basins such as the
mid-continent, onshore Louisiana and the shallow waters
of the Gulf of Mexico will continue to be important
sources of supply, by themselves they will not be
sufficient to satisfy growing demand over the next two
decades," says a report released by the Interstate
Natural Gas Association of America that focuses on
pipeline-related issues. To meet future demand, gas from
deepwater offshore in the Gulf of Mexico along with
unconventional domestic sources and liquefied natural
gas imports must be pursued.
The association says that at least $60 billion must
be invested in new pipelines or repairing older ones
over the next couple decades. But, developers are
hard-pressed to invest that capital if the impediments
to construction are too onerous and there is not enough
gas to keep the new lines filled to capacity. Developers
also want to make it easier for gas distributors to
enter into long-term contracts that help pay for the
lines.
Regulators are, largely, sympathetic. The Tampa
region, for example, will sport a new natural gas
pipeline. Construction on the Gulfstream Natural Gas
System is scheduled to begin next January and run
underwater to a power plant in St Petersburg owned by
Progress Energy. The nearly 18 mile extension, which is
part of an existing 645-mile line started in 2002, will
be completed one year later.
All projects are contentious, but the Gulfstream line
was particularly so. The proactive answer for any
developer is to estimate what future demand will be at
the time of initial construction and then to work to
accommodate that potential growth. Once that design
reaches capacity, the matter must be addressed before
problems occur by establishing neighborhood meetings and
creating a common communications strategy.
Inclusive Process
The federal government is concerned about potential
energy shortages and any subsequent rolling blackouts.
To cope, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is
trying to get all regulatory agencies to coordinate
their schedules and reviews under the Bush
administration's fast track initiative. The goal is not
to subvert the permitting process but rather, to
streamline it.
"We've taken six months off the old process," says
Robert Cupina, with FERC, in a prior talk with this
writer. "It's more thorough and there's no
corner-cutting."
The first step for developers is to determine whether
new pipelines are needed and whether the price of
natural gas supports construction such that companies
can obtain firm contracts to finance them. The next step
is to propose a route the line will take. Overall, there
still must not be any significant affect on either the
natural habitat or the landowners who lease their
rights-of-way. Those precautions will inevitably lead to
the rerouting of any transmission line or pipeline
system, although in some cases the federal government
may exercise its right of eminent domain.
California, Florida and New England have a strong
need for new natural gas supplies. Spectra Energy is a
developer that wants to expand its pipeline system
through markets in the Northeast. Altogether, the
Waltham, Mass.-based company says that it plans to
invest about $1.5 billion in expansions that will bring
incremental natural gas supplies to the Northeastern
states, all with the support of the public it expects to
serve.
As new supplies begin to enter the Northeast and new
infrastructure is placed into service, the region will
then have access to significant sources of Eastern U.S.
seaboard liquefied natural gas and Western U.S. natural
gas. "We're connecting supply from all compass points
and moving it to the Northeast region," says Fred
Fowler, Spectra Energy's CEO. "These are real projects
that offer customers supply choice and reliability, and
will bring competitive pricing to the region."
While sentiments are changing, the opposition to new
construction is almost always intense. The process to
get the permits and to overcome the environmental and
zoning questions is lengthy and expensive. Consider that
the Long Island Power Authority just recently said it
would forego building a pipeline and instead rely on an
existing line owned and operated by neighboring Keyspan
Corp.
But, generally, the need for new gas supplies and the
infrastructure to carry the gas remains an urgent
matter. Achieving a consensus is the key. Producers and
pipeline developers must be willing to meet with various
constituencies early in the process and to incorporate
their views into business plans. Developers must then be
able to adapt to changing conditions, which will
increase their chances of winning new pipeline permits
along with the necessary financing.
Copyright © 1996-2006 by
CyberTech,
Inc.
All rights reserved.