Carbon tax on large utilities evaporates
Apr 7 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - David Klepper and Jim Sullinger
The Kansas City Star, Mo.
Why should the state stop western Kansas from getting the cleanest coal
plant in the state, when eastern Kansas enjoys the power from some of the
state's dirtiest plants?
That was the question posed by lawmakers who supported Sunflower Electric
Power Corp.'s plans to build two new state-of-the-art coal plants at
Holcomb. After the expansion was blocked by a state regulator worried about
carbon emissions, efforts to get the plant built anyway became the priority
of many lawmakers this year.
Last week Rep. Clay Aurand, a Courtland Republican, suggested levying a
carbon tax on large utilities whose coal-burning power plants emitted more
carbon than average. The revenue would fund a tax break to the utility with
the lowest carbon emissions.
Significantly, the only utility that would have faced a penalty is the Board
of Public Utilities in Kansas City, Kan. It would have paid about $1 million
because of its emissions.
Sunflower Electric would have received the money as a tax credit.
In a preliminary vote, the House endorsed the proposal 78-42 but defeated it
51-74 on a final vote Tuesday morning. The reversal came as many Republicans
said they couldn't support a new tax.
Several, however, said the proposal accomplished its goal: reminding
Democrats and moderate lawmakers from eastern Kansas that it was not easy
being green when your voters may be asked to pay higher electric bills.
Plant expansion
As the legislative session wound down, Johnson County lawmakers were
scrambling to find a few million dollars to lure to De Soto a $100 million
plant expansion by Huhtamaki Americas.
An economic "impact" bill would allow the Kansas secretary of commerce to
spend about $40 million on efforts to attract businesses and job expansion.
In its original form, the bill would allow the secretary to write a check to
a company for expansion. A cost-conscious Senate stripped out that provision
and only allowed bonding authority.
A competing House measure includes the cash provision. A final version
probably won't emerge until the upcoming wrap-up session April 30.
The Finland-based company owns a packaging plant in De Soto, employing 440
people, as well as 10 other U.S. facilities.
Day care
Changing the rules that regulate day-care operations was proposed this
session but appeared too complicated for lawmakers to digest.
Rep. Arlen Siegfreid, an Olathe Republican and chairman of the House Federal
and State Affairs Committee, said the bill won't be considered this session.
The bill would have allowed day-care providers to take in more school-age
children before and after school and on non-school days.
To reach David Klepper, call 785-354-1388 or send e-mail to dklepper@kcstar.com.
To reach Jim Sullinger, call 785-354-1388 or send e-mail to jsullinger@kcstar.com. |