| Carbon tax on large utilities evaporates   Apr 7 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - David Klepper and Jim Sullinger 
    The Kansas City Star, Mo.
 Why should the state stop western Kansas from getting the cleanest coal 
    plant in the state, when eastern Kansas enjoys the power from some of the 
    state's dirtiest plants?
 
 That was the question posed by lawmakers who supported Sunflower Electric 
    Power Corp.'s plans to build two new state-of-the-art coal plants at 
    Holcomb. After the expansion was blocked by a state regulator worried about 
    carbon emissions, efforts to get the plant built anyway became the priority 
    of many lawmakers this year.
 
 Last week Rep. Clay Aurand, a Courtland Republican, suggested levying a 
    carbon tax on large utilities whose coal-burning power plants emitted more 
    carbon than average. The revenue would fund a tax break to the utility with 
    the lowest carbon emissions.
 
 Significantly, the only utility that would have faced a penalty is the Board 
    of Public Utilities in Kansas City, Kan. It would have paid about $1 million 
    because of its emissions.
 
 Sunflower Electric would have received the money as a tax credit.
 
 In a preliminary vote, the House endorsed the proposal 78-42 but defeated it 
    51-74 on a final vote Tuesday morning. The reversal came as many Republicans 
    said they couldn't support a new tax.
 
 Several, however, said the proposal accomplished its goal: reminding 
    Democrats and moderate lawmakers from eastern Kansas that it was not easy 
    being green when your voters may be asked to pay higher electric bills.
 
 Plant expansion
 
 As the legislative session wound down, Johnson County lawmakers were 
    scrambling to find a few million dollars to lure to De Soto a $100 million 
    plant expansion by Huhtamaki Americas.
 
 An economic "impact" bill would allow the Kansas secretary of commerce to 
    spend about $40 million on efforts to attract businesses and job expansion.
 
 In its original form, the bill would allow the secretary to write a check to 
    a company for expansion. A cost-conscious Senate stripped out that provision 
    and only allowed bonding authority.
 
 A competing House measure includes the cash provision. A final version 
    probably won't emerge until the upcoming wrap-up session April 30.
 
 The Finland-based company owns a packaging plant in De Soto, employing 440 
    people, as well as 10 other U.S. facilities.
 
 Day care
 
 Changing the rules that regulate day-care operations was proposed this 
    session but appeared too complicated for lawmakers to digest.
 
 Rep. Arlen Siegfreid, an Olathe Republican and chairman of the House Federal 
    and State Affairs Committee, said the bill won't be considered this session.
 
 The bill would have allowed day-care providers to take in more school-age 
    children before and after school and on non-school days.
 
 To reach David Klepper, call 785-354-1388 or send e-mail to dklepper@kcstar.com. 
    To reach Jim Sullinger, call 785-354-1388 or send e-mail to jsullinger@kcstar.com.
 |