| Fueling Ethanol Production While Protecting 
    Water Quality 4/1/2008 Madison, WI
 Grain-based ethanol production has increased dramatically in recent years 
    as the cost and instability of oil has increased. New U.S. government 
    policies require major increases in ethanol production. While future plans 
    call for a viable cellulosic ethanol industry, expanded grain ethanol 
    production will lead to further growth of corn acres in the near term, with 
    unintended negative water quality impacts. Currently, U.S. grain-based 
    ethanol production is concentrated in the “Corn Belt”; however, several 
    large production plants are under construction or planned near population 
    centers in the eastern U.S. An interdisciplinary group of scientists 
    evaluated potential impacts of grain- and cellulose-based ethanol on 
    nutrient and animal management as they relate to water quality impacts on 
    U.S. inland and coastal waters, particularly the Northern Gulf of Mexico 
    (Mississippi River Basin discharge). The results of their evaluation were 
    published in the March–April issue of the Journal of Environmental Quality 
    and were also considered in the U.S. EPA Scientific Advisory Board’s 2007 
    Hypoxia Advisory Panel’s report.
 The group of scientists recommended rigorous implementation of advanced 
    conservation measures to minimize N and P losses from new or more 
    intensively managed corn to partially offset nutrient loss increases. These 
    measures include precision and variable rate applications of fertilizers, 
    inter-seeding corn with cover crops, and inclusion of buffers or riparian 
    filter strips. A viable perennial grass, wood, or waste-based cellulosic 
    ethanol industry could provide water quality benefits and other ecosystem 
    services. Regardless of feedstock, policy and scientific decisions must 
    consider and address unintended consequences of biofuel production on the 
    environment, particularly water quality, to avoid higher, future costs of 
    remediation and ecosystem restoration.
 
 Corn prices nearly doubled between 2005 (about $2.25 a bushel) and 2007 
    (about $4 per bushel; now about $5.00 per bushel) and there was a 15% 
    increase in U.S. corn acres last year. The scientists projected that much of 
    this increased acreage would come from land in soybeans (50%), the 
    Conservation Reserve Program (25%), and hay and pastures (25%). Recent data 
    indicate that much row crop conversion was from cotton as well as soybeans. 
    This would not impact P loss estimates and could increase N loss. Even with 
    recommended fertilizer and management, corn can be a greater source of N and 
    P loss to water than soybeans, perennials, or hay crops. Most of the corn 
    acreage increase occurred in the Mississippi River Basin, and in this basin, 
    most N and P that leaves fields is delivered to the Gulf.
 
 Dried distiller’s grains, a by-product of ethanol production, is being used 
    in animal feeds, particularly for dairy and beef. Dried distiller’s grains 
    contain high concentrations of P and may elevate manure P (and N) content, 
    even when less than 20% of the animals’ diets. This may erode efforts to 
    reduce ration and manure P and will make government feed management programs 
    more expensive and less attractive to farmers. The use of wet distiller’s 
    grains as feed near ethanol facilities avoids the cost of drying the 
    distiller’s grains but requires co-location of animal operations, which will 
    concentrate manure production, often far from grain production, making 
    effective manure use as a fertilizer more difficult and expensive.
 
 Cellulosic fuel stocks from perennials such as switchgrass and woody 
    materials also have the potential to produce ethanol. While cellulosic 
    feedstock production, storage, handling and conversion technology still 
    limit production, a viable cellulosic ethanol industry could reduce 
    dependence on grain and provide water quality and other environmental 
    benefits (such as C sequestration and wildlife habitat). For example, 
    switchgrass, a warm-season perennial prairie grass, produces large amounts 
    of biomass for feedstock, loses very little N and P compared to corn, and 
    stores C in its extensive root system.
 
 SOURCE: The Soil Science Society of America (SSSA)
 |