Fueling Ethanol Production While Protecting
Water Quality
4/1/2008 Madison, WI
Grain-based ethanol production has increased dramatically in recent years
as the cost and instability of oil has increased. New U.S. government
policies require major increases in ethanol production. While future plans
call for a viable cellulosic ethanol industry, expanded grain ethanol
production will lead to further growth of corn acres in the near term, with
unintended negative water quality impacts. Currently, U.S. grain-based
ethanol production is concentrated in the “Corn Belt”; however, several
large production plants are under construction or planned near population
centers in the eastern U.S. An interdisciplinary group of scientists
evaluated potential impacts of grain- and cellulose-based ethanol on
nutrient and animal management as they relate to water quality impacts on
U.S. inland and coastal waters, particularly the Northern Gulf of Mexico
(Mississippi River Basin discharge). The results of their evaluation were
published in the March–April issue of the Journal of Environmental Quality
and were also considered in the U.S. EPA Scientific Advisory Board’s 2007
Hypoxia Advisory Panel’s report.
The group of scientists recommended rigorous implementation of advanced
conservation measures to minimize N and P losses from new or more
intensively managed corn to partially offset nutrient loss increases. These
measures include precision and variable rate applications of fertilizers,
inter-seeding corn with cover crops, and inclusion of buffers or riparian
filter strips. A viable perennial grass, wood, or waste-based cellulosic
ethanol industry could provide water quality benefits and other ecosystem
services. Regardless of feedstock, policy and scientific decisions must
consider and address unintended consequences of biofuel production on the
environment, particularly water quality, to avoid higher, future costs of
remediation and ecosystem restoration.
Corn prices nearly doubled between 2005 (about $2.25 a bushel) and 2007
(about $4 per bushel; now about $5.00 per bushel) and there was a 15%
increase in U.S. corn acres last year. The scientists projected that much of
this increased acreage would come from land in soybeans (50%), the
Conservation Reserve Program (25%), and hay and pastures (25%). Recent data
indicate that much row crop conversion was from cotton as well as soybeans.
This would not impact P loss estimates and could increase N loss. Even with
recommended fertilizer and management, corn can be a greater source of N and
P loss to water than soybeans, perennials, or hay crops. Most of the corn
acreage increase occurred in the Mississippi River Basin, and in this basin,
most N and P that leaves fields is delivered to the Gulf.
Dried distiller’s grains, a by-product of ethanol production, is being used
in animal feeds, particularly for dairy and beef. Dried distiller’s grains
contain high concentrations of P and may elevate manure P (and N) content,
even when less than 20% of the animals’ diets. This may erode efforts to
reduce ration and manure P and will make government feed management programs
more expensive and less attractive to farmers. The use of wet distiller’s
grains as feed near ethanol facilities avoids the cost of drying the
distiller’s grains but requires co-location of animal operations, which will
concentrate manure production, often far from grain production, making
effective manure use as a fertilizer more difficult and expensive.
Cellulosic fuel stocks from perennials such as switchgrass and woody
materials also have the potential to produce ethanol. While cellulosic
feedstock production, storage, handling and conversion technology still
limit production, a viable cellulosic ethanol industry could reduce
dependence on grain and provide water quality and other environmental
benefits (such as C sequestration and wildlife habitat). For example,
switchgrass, a warm-season perennial prairie grass, produces large amounts
of biomass for feedstock, loses very little N and P compared to corn, and
stores C in its extensive root system.
SOURCE: The Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) |