| Oceans in the red   Alok Jha  Its shocking but true. Human activities have left over 
    40 per cent of the worlds oceans damaged!
											
										
     
  Fishing, 
    climate change and pollution have left an indelible mark on virtually all of 
    the world's oceans, according to a huge study that has mapped the total 
    human impact on the seas for the first time. Scientists found that almost no 
    areas have been left pristine and more than 40 per cent of the world's 
    oceans have been heavily affected. 
 "This project allows us to finally start to see the big picture of how 
    humans are affecting the oceans," said Ben Halpern, assistant research 
    scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who led the 
    research.
 "Our results show that when these and other individual impacts are summed 
    up, the big picture looks much worse than I imagine most people expected. It 
    was certainly a surprise to me."
 Human impact is most severe in the North 
    Sea, the South and East China Seas, the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, the 
    Red Sea, the Gulf, the Bering Sea, along the eastern coast of North America 
    and in much of the western Pacific. 
 The oceans at the poles are less affected but melting ice sheets will leave 
    them vulnerable, researchers said.
 The study found that almost half of the world's coral reefs have been 
    heavily damaged. Other concerns rest with seagrass beds, mangrove forests, 
    seamounts, rocky reefs and continental shelves.
 
 Soft-bottom ecosystems and open ocean fared best but even these were not 
    pristine in most locations.
 Previous studies of human impacts have focused on a single activity or on an 
    isolated ecosystem, and rarely on a global scale.
 
 Fiorenza Micheli, an associate professor of biology at Stanford University, 
    said the maps should guide ocean management in future.
 
 "By seeing where different activities occur and whether they occur in 
    sensitive ecosystems, we can design management strategies aimed at shifting 
    activities away from the most sensitive areas."
 To make the map scientists compiled global data on the impacts of 17 human 
    activities including fishing, coastal development, fertiliser runoff and 
    pollution from shipping traffic.
 
 They divided the ocean into one-square-kilometre cells and worked out which 
    human activities might have touched each particular cell. For each cell, the 
    scientists allocated an impact score to look at the degree to which human 
    activities affected 20 types of ecosystems.
 
 Around 41 per cent had medium high to very high impact scores. A small 
    fraction, 0.5 per cent but representing 2.2m square kilometre, were rated 
    very highly affected.
 
 Halpern said the results, which were published in the journal Science and 
    presented recently to the American Association for the Advancement of 
    Science annual meeting, still gave room for hope.
 
 "With targeted efforts to protect the chunks of the ocean that remain 
    relatively pristine we have a good chance of preserving these areas in good 
    condition."
 Andrew Rosenberg, a professor of natural resources at the University of New 
    Hampshire, who was not involved with the study, said: "Clearly we can no 
    longer just focus on fishing or coastal wetland loss or pollution as if they 
    are separate effects.
 
 "These human impacts overlap in space and time, and in far too many cases 
    the magnitude is frighteningly high."
 He added: "The message for policy-makers seems clear to me: conservation 
    action that cuts across the whole set of human impacts is needed now in many 
    places around the globe."
 
 Highlighting examples of action, the researchers said that, for example, 
    fishing zones have been shown to help ecosystems survive better, and 
    navigation routes across seas have been altered to protect sensitive ocean 
    areas.
 
 Although the research will be helpful, making conservation decisions will 
    require more detailed research at the local level, said Micheli.
 
 "Our results and approach, augmented with additional local information, can 
    also inform management at a local and regional scale. Looking at the data 
    globally, some information is lost."
 
 Halpern said the map was a wake-up call. "Humans will always use the oceans 
    for recreation, extraction of resources, and for commercial activity such as 
    shipping. This is a good thing.
 
 “Our goal, and really our necessity, is to do this in a sustainable way so 
    that our oceans remain in a healthy state and continue to provide us with 
    the resources we need and want."
 
 The Guardian
 |