Oceans in the red
Alok Jha
Its shocking but true. Human activities have left over
40 per cent of the worlds oceans damaged!
Fishing,
climate change and pollution have left an indelible mark on virtually all of
the world's oceans, according to a huge study that has mapped the total
human impact on the seas for the first time. Scientists found that almost no
areas have been left pristine and more than 40 per cent of the world's
oceans have been heavily affected.
"This project allows us to finally start to see the big picture of how
humans are affecting the oceans," said Ben Halpern, assistant research
scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who led the
research.
"Our results show that when these and other individual impacts are summed
up, the big picture looks much worse than I imagine most people expected. It
was certainly a surprise to me."
Human impact is most severe in the North
Sea, the South and East China Seas, the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, the
Red Sea, the Gulf, the Bering Sea, along the eastern coast of North America
and in much of the western Pacific.
The oceans at the poles are less affected but melting ice sheets will leave
them vulnerable, researchers said.
The study found that almost half of the world's coral reefs have been
heavily damaged. Other concerns rest with seagrass beds, mangrove forests,
seamounts, rocky reefs and continental shelves.
Soft-bottom ecosystems and open ocean fared best but even these were not
pristine in most locations.
Previous studies of human impacts have focused on a single activity or on an
isolated ecosystem, and rarely on a global scale.
Fiorenza Micheli, an associate professor of biology at Stanford University,
said the maps should guide ocean management in future.
"By seeing where different activities occur and whether they occur in
sensitive ecosystems, we can design management strategies aimed at shifting
activities away from the most sensitive areas."
To make the map scientists compiled global data on the impacts of 17 human
activities including fishing, coastal development, fertiliser runoff and
pollution from shipping traffic.
They divided the ocean into one-square-kilometre cells and worked out which
human activities might have touched each particular cell. For each cell, the
scientists allocated an impact score to look at the degree to which human
activities affected 20 types of ecosystems.
Around 41 per cent had medium high to very high impact scores. A small
fraction, 0.5 per cent but representing 2.2m square kilometre, were rated
very highly affected.
Halpern said the results, which were published in the journal Science and
presented recently to the American Association for the Advancement of
Science annual meeting, still gave room for hope.
"With targeted efforts to protect the chunks of the ocean that remain
relatively pristine we have a good chance of preserving these areas in good
condition."
Andrew Rosenberg, a professor of natural resources at the University of New
Hampshire, who was not involved with the study, said: "Clearly we can no
longer just focus on fishing or coastal wetland loss or pollution as if they
are separate effects.
"These human impacts overlap in space and time, and in far too many cases
the magnitude is frighteningly high."
He added: "The message for policy-makers seems clear to me: conservation
action that cuts across the whole set of human impacts is needed now in many
places around the globe."
Highlighting examples of action, the researchers said that, for example,
fishing zones have been shown to help ecosystems survive better, and
navigation routes across seas have been altered to protect sensitive ocean
areas.
Although the research will be helpful, making conservation decisions will
require more detailed research at the local level, said Micheli.
"Our results and approach, augmented with additional local information, can
also inform management at a local and regional scale. Looking at the data
globally, some information is lost."
Halpern said the map was a wake-up call. "Humans will always use the oceans
for recreation, extraction of resources, and for commercial activity such as
shipping. This is a good thing.
“Our goal, and really our necessity, is to do this in a sustainable way so
that our oceans remain in a healthy state and continue to provide us with
the resources we need and want."
The Guardian
|