| Confessions of a presumed
terrorist
Posted: August 01, 2008
by:
Steve Russell
Too many years ago, I attended my 25th Not High
School Reunion in Bristow, Okla. ''Not High School'' because I am a sort of
honorary Purple Pirate, having left high school in the ninth grade to join
the service and save Saigon from the Viet Cong, who I was convinced would
then take Sausalito and Sallisaw.
I saw the lady who had been the principal of Edison Elementary School, where
I had gotten sent to the office so many times. She looked exactly as I
remembered her from the '50s - older than dirt. I walked up and spoke to
her:
''You probably don't remember me, but ...''
''Hello, Stephen,'' she interrupted, ''how is Wanda?'' That would be my
mother, who this woman had also taught.
I'm an urban Indian now, but those who grew up on reservations or in places
like that little town in the Creek Nation will remember how everybody knew
everybody's business. There was no way my one-eighth blood quantum would
allow me to play white boy if I was so inclined, and no way to escape
whatever I had coming for my numerous malfeasances. No place to run and no
place to hide. Same thing when visiting relatives in the Cherokee Nation or
over on the Osage reservation. Just mentioning my name connected me in ways
not avoidable.
Did ''privacy'' have any meaning then? I've done a lot of thinking about
that since I moved away and changed my name and gained briefly the
possibility of being anonymous.
Yes, it did have some meaning. We may have known everybody's business, but
we had sense enough to stay out of it. We had bootleggers when Oklahoma was
dry, and it's not like we didn't know who they were. People more or less got
away with extramarital affairs, and each little town had some ladies who
would provide sex for money without ever walking the streets.
I said that I ditched school after the ninth grade. In fact, I did not
really finish the sixth or the eighth grades, either. I was hiding in the
Bristow Public Library most of the time. Did I think the librarian did not
know me or my age? Not a chance. But I caused her no trouble and she caused
me none, and I got my education reading books by the shelf in no particular
order while everybody else my age that was not working on a farm went to
classes.
Where there is no privacy, there is a strong live-and-let-live ethic. I hope
the country remembers that as the legal privacies we have enjoyed crumble in
the face of the so-called war on terror.
I used to run on and off commercial airliners at will because I had a wife
working for Southwest and a daughter working for Delta. I flew everywhere.
Now, it's a burden to set foot in an airport as a paying customer. I don't
know if there really is ''somebody with my name'' on the secret terrorist
watch list or the person is really me because I have criticized the
government so often, but I cannot get advance boarding passes and I always
get very special treatment when screened. Now I hear that there will be
''random'' searches of bus and train passengers, who will be required to
carry photo identification like airline passengers.
Starting next year, American citizens will be required to carry passports
for day trips into Mexico or Canada. I wonder how this will affect those
Indian nations that span the border, where the northerners have spelled-out
rights under the Jay Treaty and the southerners have implied rights under
the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. Indian nations, after all, antedate Canada,
Mexico and the United States.
I remember being asked to ''state my citizenship'' when returning from
Mexico and answering ''Cherokee Nation.'' Today that would probably get me a
body cavity search.
Just last month, I sold my house here in Indiana in anticipation of retiring
and moving to be with my kids and grandkids. I had a sum of money that it
seemed wise to put in an interest-bearing account until I was able to put it
down on a retirement house.
The Dutch Internet bank that owned my online brokerage account was
advertising 3.5 percent, which is not too shabby these days. I spent a full
week trying to identify myself well enough to comply with what the bank
thought the USA PATRIOT Act required. I went ballistic when they asked me
the birthday of my deceased wife, although my current wife was much calmer
when they questioned her about the mother of her ex-husband from more than
10 years ago.
The final upshot was that they wanted a copy of my Social Security card,
which is not something I remember carrying around. However, when I was
moving the card turned up tucked in my passport, so I faxed it to the bank,
circling the language on the card that said ''not to be used for
identification'' and scrawling an anti-USA PATRIOT rant on the copy. I also
copied my passport for them while I was at it, but they still denied me an
account. I guess I was a terrorist for savings account purposes but not
brokerage account purposes.
Then my wife noticed the bank that held the mortgage we had just paid off
had an online savings account with 3 percent interest. We spent another week
trying to get past USA PATRIOT with them. They were satisfied with our
identities but not with our address. It seems we had just moved. Well, yes.
That's where we got the money we were trying to stash, and they had the
mortgage. So sorry, left hand does not talk to right hand, but you may
reapply for an account in 30 days if you are at the same address.
Good grief! We wound up at the University of Texas Credit Union, where I
have had an account since law school, at 2.8 percent. I was able to transfer
the funds electronically from the Indiana University Credit Union in one
day. I never liked banks, anyway.
There is something peculiarly impersonal about the modern lack of privacy. I
remember when I was a traffic court judge intervening for an Indian who was
born on the reservation and had no birth certificate and was being denied a
driver's license. I don't think I could swing that today, judge or not. I
can't even put my money in a bank. We can't travel or work without
subjecting ourselves to the panoptic vision of the government or our
employers or both. I saw on TV the other day that some employers are
requiring employees to have identifying chips embedded in their skin like
the ones we inject in our pets to help them come home. And we thought it was
bad to have to pee in a jar while somebody watched?
The bottom line is that being watched in a personal manner did not bother
me. Being watched in an impersonal manner does.
Steve Russell, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, is a Texas trial court judge
by assignment and an associate professor of criminal justice at Indiana
University - Bloomington. He is a columnist for Indian Country Today.
© 1998 - 2008 Indian
Country Today. All Rights Reserved To subscribe or visit go to:
http://www.indiancountry.com
|