California Says Yucca Poses Threat to People,
Resources
Dec 25 - Las Vegas Review - Journal
California is urging federal regulators to turn down the Energy Department's
bid to build a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, charging analysts
did not fully study how the plan would affect Death Valley groundwater and
the state's transportation networks.
"Proceeding with the project in the manner described by DOE poses a threat
to the people, natural resources and environment of California," attorneys
said at the outset of a 400-page document filed with the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
The commission "may not approve DOE's license application unless DOE
provides an adequate environmental analysis that analyzes threats to
California and how to mitigate them," said the lawyers from the state's
Energy Commission and its Department of Justice.
California's objections were made available on Monday, several days after
Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto announced Nevada was submitting 229
repository challenges to the NRC on a variety of technical grounds.
There is significance to California raising similar issues before the NRC,
according to Joe Strolin, planning division administrator for the Nevada
Agency for Nuclear Projects.
"Anytime you have California in the mix it lends a gravitas to an issue,"
Strolin said Tuesday.
"They are always considered a 600-pound gorilla in the room," Strolin said.
"Having them weigh in makes a statement that this is an important issue and
not just a Nevada issue. That there are other states, and big states, that
have concerns as well."
DOE spokesman Allen Benson said the department was reviewing the contentions
and would respond to them within 50 days, as set in NRC regulations.
California attorneys identified 24 issues it wants the NRC to consider as it
weighs the safety of the repository plan and decides whether to issue DOE a
construction license.
Many of California's contentions charge the government failed to adequately
analyze the transportation impacts from hundreds of radioactive waste
shipments that would originate at reactors in the state as well as shipments
through California from other states.
"DOE has not conducted sufficient analysis or provided sufficient evidence
that such shipments will be conducted in the safest manner," according to
the state's complaint.
Attorneys said DOE took care to fully analyze transportation risks in Nevada
"yet it illogically did not do this analysis for the likely transportation
routes in the rest of the country, and specifically not in California."
The state's complaint further said DOE has failed to analyze how waste at
California reactors could be packaged safely for shipping.
California has four operating reactors, two at Diablo Canyon, near San Luis
Obispo, and two at San Onofre, about halfway between Los Angeles and San
Diego. Three other reactors - at San Onofre, the Humboldt Bay station in
Eureka and the Rancho Seco plant south of Sacramento are no longer operating
but spent fuel is stored there and is awaiting removal.
Collectively, the reactors have generated 2,510 tons of spent nuclear fuel,
according to the Nuclear Energy Institute.
Other California contentions charge that more analysis is needed to
determine how a buildup of contaminants expected to leak from the Yucca site
over time would affect aquifers that feed springs in Death Valley.
"Recent scientific work done by the County of Inyo indicates that
contaminants entering the carbonate aquifer from the repository could
migrate to the springs in Death Valley relatively quickly," attorneys said.
"These springs are the only source of water for the park workers and the
approximately 1.25 million annual visitors to Death Valley National Park,"
attorneys said.
Contact Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com
or 202-783-1760.
(c) 2008 Las Vegas Review - Journal. Provided by ProQuest
LLC. All rights Reserved. |