Generating project to tap Mississippi River
power
Dec 5 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Tom Charlier The Commercial
Appeal, Memphis, Tenn.
Deep beneath the swirling, shifting surface of the Mississippi River,
powerful forces are going to waste.
During even the lowest of river stages, the Mississippi's current can exceed
6 mph and push more than 1.5 million gallons of water per second past any
given point at Memphis.
No one's ever really tried to harness all that energy -- until now.
Three companies this year have received preliminary federal permits to
pursue projects that involve the installation of submerged turbine
generators at more than 60 locations along the Mississippi, including one at
Memphis.
If the firms receive final licensing by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, large-scale construction could begin within three years on
projects employing an emerging type of generating technology known as
hydrokinetic power.
Unlike conventional hydro-electric facilities, the projects won't require
ecologically devastating dams or river diversions. Mounted on pilings in the
river bed, or on bridge piers or even barges, the turbines will spin in the
natural current, producing clean, renewable power for sale to the electrical
grid or individual industries.
"They look like an underwater jet engine, but they function like a
windmill," said Jon Guidroz, director of project development for Free Flow
Power Corp., a Massachusetts-based firm that plans the largest network of
turbines along the Mississippi.
In addition to the initiatives along the Mississippi, FERC has approved
preliminary permits for hydrokinetic initiatives on other rivers, including
the Missouri and Ohio, as well as projects involving wave-powered turbines
along the West Coast.
The 55 turbine sites planned by Free Flow on the Mississippi between St.
Louis and the Gulf of Mexico would cost $3 billion and generate 1,600
megawatts of electricity. That's more power than typically produced by a
nuclear reactor unit and roughly twice the output of the Tennessee Valley
Authority's Allen Fossil Plant in Memphis.
Free Flow plans to install clusters of six turbines on pilings and bridge
piers. With a current of 2 meters per second, each cluster would generate 60
kilowatts, but the output could increase to 240 kilowatts if the flow is 3
meters per second, Guidroz said.
The company's turbines will be about 10 feet in diameter and installed well
below the minimum 9-foot depth of the navigation channel. The Mississippi
reaches depths of up to 110 feet in some of the river bends under
consideration as turbine sites.
"The reason we're starting so large is we think it's important to achieve
economies of scale," he said.
"This is a massive river... There's a lot of potential to harness energy."
Memphis would be a "lead site" for the Free Flow network, a place where the
technology would have a high profile for display, Guidroz said.
Another firm proposing the turbines is Hydro Green Energy, a
Connecticut-based firm planning 5-megawatt projects near Natchez and
Vicksburg, Miss., and elsewhere.
Company spokesman Mark Stover said Hydro Green's turbines are suspended from
the surface or mounted on barges. The firm already is installing an initial
unit in Minnesota.
The companies received the preliminary permits as FERC somewhat revised its
licensing rules to provide a streamlined process for some hydrokinetic
projects.
The permits give the firms exclusive rights to study specific reaches of the
river. To ensure companies don't just use the authorizations to tie up
activity on parts of the Mississippi, the permits contain deadlines for
certain reports and progress.
"If they aren't complying with the terms of the permit, we cancel it," said
FERC spokesman Celeste Miller.
After the studies are completed, the firms can seek full licenses, which
typically are good for periods of 30 to 50 years, to generate power in the
river. Free Flow intends to submit a 1,000-page pre-application document to
FERC in January, Guidroz said.
But FERC isn't the only agency that will review the hydrokinetic projects.
The Corps of Engineers, which regulates navigation and flood control along
the river, must ensure the turbines don't interfere with other uses of the
Mississippi.
"We're not going to let them put something in the river that's going to
damage or cause harm to the towing industry," said David Berretta, chief of
hydraulics for the corps' Memphis district.
Developers say their projects will be not only compatible with other
river-users, but environmentally sensitive, as shown in studies reporting
virtually no harm to fish and aquatic life.
Free Flow's submerged generating units also will not use any chemical
lubricants, eliminating the danger of polluting the river.
Environmentalists, who have long complained about the harm caused by dams,
are tentatively optimistic about the hydrokinetic power projects.
"It's sort of an experiment. We've never seen one," said John Seebach,
director of the hydropower reform initiative for the group American Rivers.
"I'm all for putting them in the water as long as you say up front, 'These
are the impacts we can live with, and if bad things happen we'll take them
out.'"
A major challenge for the initiatives will be designing ways to protect the
turbines from the logs, sand and debris carried by the Mississippi's
current. The firms say they are designing their projects to deal with the
hazards.
"I think there's tremendous potential in the Mississippi River. The
challenge will be how developers balance all of the interests," said Hydro
Green's Stover.
Copyright © 2008The
McClatchy Company |