Wind Project Hits a Hurdle in Scotland: The Push
for More Renewable Energy Can Clash With Concerns for the Land
Nov 27 - International Herald Tribune
On the Isle of Lewis, a blustery wedge of highland and bog at the northern
tip of the Outer Scottish Hebrides, a battle over a planned wind farm holds
lessons for investors and industrialists seeking to meet alternative energy
targets for Europe.
The island's 859 square miles, or 2,225 square kilometers, are home to about
20,000 people and 12 protected bird species that include black-throated
divers, golden plovers and white-tailed sea eagles. Under plans submitted in
2004 by Lewis Wind Power, a joint venture between British Energy Group and
the energy engineering services company Amec, it would also become home to
one of the world's biggest wind farms.
A rambling complex of 181 turbines, connecting cables and support
facilities, the proposed farm could contribute the equivalent of 6 percent
of the British renewable energy target for 2010: And follow- up proposals
for a further 64 turbines could turn Lewis and neighboring islands into a
major power-generating hub.
Despite fierce opposition from local campaigners, the project received
approval from the local authority, the Western Isles Council, early in 2007.
But in a surprising reversal, the Scottish government rejected the project
in April this year on the ground that enough planning applications already
existed to meet Scottish renewable energy targets and that the project would
do serious damage to peat marshes that are designated as a Special
Protection Area under European Union bird and habitat directives.
The government is now compiling a study of renewable energy resources in the
Western Isles, to be published early next year. The study aims to clarify
the role of renewable energy in sustaining Scottish economic growth and what
else Scotland needs to do to achieve its target of supplying 50 percent of
its gross electricity consumption from renewable sources by 2020.
Lewis Wind Power, meanwhile, is drafting another proposal to put forward
after the study is published.
The company "believes that the government's assessment of the scheme is
flawed," said David Hodkinson, a project manager. In addition to the energy
benefits, "the proposals would have enhanced tourism" on the island, he
said. "Currently there are a very limited number of hotels on Lewis, which
are reliant on a very short tourist season. The wind farm would have
potentially helped create a more sustainable tourist industry."
The British Wind Energy Association say that a more robust planning policy
is needed if Britain is to meet its 2010 renewable energy targets. The
average time for applications to be processed is now 11 months, despite
government guidelines stating that major proposals should be decided within
16 weeks.
So far this year, Britain has seen 32 proposals refused, 50 approved and 24
built, according to the association. Even after approval, energy companies
have to overcome multiple barriers including turbine-order backlogs,
compliance with British aviation radar regulations, and connection to the
national electricity grid. These can stretch construction and commissioning
delays up to two years for large wind farms, the association said.
The global wind market is growing fast: from $30.1 billion in revenues last
year, it is likely to reach $83.4 billion in 2017, according to a report
published this year by the research firm Clean Edge, based in San Francisco.
But as the industry grows, so does opposition from local communities and
environmentalists.
The Lewis project is a case in point. Nearly 11,000 Scots signed a petition
against it, arguing that the proposal would have created a development zone
of turbines, roads, quarries, transmission lines and other forms of
infrastructure stretching almost continuously for 40 miles, or 65 kilometers
across the Lewis moorland, threatening internationally recognized
populations of protected species and peat lands.
Martin Scott, the Western Isles officer for the Royal Society for the
Protection of Birds said areas of natural beauty should not be destroyed in
the name of cutting carbon emissions.
"Developers seem to be going for remoter areas where there are less people,"
Scott said. "Obviously, if they were built near to big cities, there would
be far more complaints." A wind farm on the Smola Islands, off the coast of
Norway, kills four or five white- tailed eagles every year, a potentially
devastating toll considering their "incredibly slow rate of reproduction,"
he warned.
On Lewis, bird-watching is one of the major attractions for the thousands of
visitors who come to the island every year.
According to Moorland Without Turbines, a local protest group, 143,402
recreational visitors came to the Western Isles in 2006 - the equivalent of
five times the permanent population - supporting around 1,000 jobs and
injecting more than pound(s)36 million, or $54 million, to the islands'
economy.
But Hodkinson, the project manager, said that "recent Scottish
government-commissioned research demonstrated that there is minimal impact
on tourism from on-shore wind farms."
"The number of visits to the island would have increased due to the
construction and maintenance of the wind farm," he said.
Meanwhile, the Scottish Tourist Board, also known as VisitScotland, says it
supports the drive for renewable energy and recognizes the potential of
Scotland's vast resources. Still, the increasing number of planning
applications worries some board members.
"VisitScotland is becoming increasingly concerned over the proliferation of
speculative development proposals, many of them in areas of high landscape
or scenic value or in locations which directly impact on tourism," it said.
Neil MaCauthur, owner of the Eshcol Guest House on Lewis said the islanders
"are generally split down the middle" on the issue.
"There is no doubt that wind farms would boost the island's economy, but
whether there is a spin-off effect on the tourism industry is unknown," he
said. "It really is an unknown quantity."
Still, wind industry advocates argue that sacrifices must be made if
countries are to meet government targets on reduced carbon emissions - in
Britain the European Union target is to supply 15 percent of total energy
demand with renewable sources by 2020 - and help fight global warming.
According to Greenpeace, Britain generates 5 percent of its electricity from
renewable sources.
Ditlev Engel, the chief executive of Vestas Wind Systems, the world's
largest wind turbine manufacturer, expresses deep concern about the lack of
energy resources to serve adequately the needs and expectations of a growing
global population.
"If people don't want turbines in their own back yard, we should be asking
people what we should do instead," he said. "Would you prefer that we build
a new coal plant?"
The question will not go away: For now, the eagles still soar over Lewis, to
the relief of many islanders and environmentalists.
"The government has made it clear, in repeated statements on this issue,
that renewables must be delivered, but not at any price," the bird
protection society said.
Originally published by The New York Times Media Group.
(c) 2008 International Herald Tribune. Provided by
ProQuest LLC. All rights Reserved.
|