| Studying Rivers For Clues To Global Carbon Cycle 
    2/12/2008 Evanston, IL
 In the science world, in the media, and recently, in our daily lives, the 
    debate continues over how carbon in the atmosphere is affecting global 
    climate change. Studying just how carbon cycles throughout the Earth is an 
    enormous challenge, but one Northwestern University professor is doing his 
    part by studying one important segment -- rivers.
 Aaron Packman, associate professor of civil and environmental engineering in 
    the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, is collaborating 
    with ecologists and microbiologists from around the world to study how 
    organic carbon is processed in rivers.
 
 Packman, who specializes in studying how particles and sediment move around 
    in rivers, is co-author of a paper on the topic published online in the 
    journal Nature Geoscience.
 
 The paper evaluates our current understanding of carbon dynamics in rivers 
    and reaches two important conclusions: it argues that carbon processing in 
    rivers is a bigger component of global carbon cycling than people previously 
    thought, and it lays out a framework for how scientists should go about 
    assessing those processes.
 
 Much more is known about carbon cycling in the atmosphere and oceans than in 
    rivers. Evaluating large-scale material cycling in a river provides a 
    challenge -- everything is constantly moving, and a lot of it moves in 
    floods. As a result, much of what we know about carbon processing in rivers 
    is based on what flows into the ocean.
 
 “But that’s not really enough,” Packman said. “You miss all this internal 
    cycling.”
 
 In order to understand how carbon cycles around the globe -- through the 
    land, freshwater, oceans and atmosphere -- scientists need to understand how 
    it moves around, how it’s produced, how it’s retained in different places 
    and how long it stays there.
 
 In rivers, carbon is both transformed and consumed. Microorganisms like 
    algae take carbon out of the atmosphere and incorporate it into their own 
    cells, while bacteria eat dead organic matter and then release CO2 back into 
    the atmosphere.
 
 “It’s been known for a long time that global carbon models don’t really 
    account for all the carbon,” Packman said. “There’s a loss of carbon, and 
    one place that could be occurring is in river systems.” Even though river 
    waters contain a small fraction of the total water on earth, they are such 
    dynamic environments because microorganisms consume and transform carbon at 
    rapid rates.
 
 “We’re evaluating how the structure and transport conditions and the 
    dynamics of rivers create a greater opportunity for microbial processing,” 
    Packman said.
 
 Packman is the first to admit that studying microorganisms, carbon and 
    rivers sounds more like ecology than engineering. But such problems require 
    work from all different areas, he said.
 
 “We’re dealing with such interdisciplinary problems, tough problems, so we 
    have to put fluid mechanics, transport, ecology and microbiology together to 
    find this overall cycling of carbon,” he said. “People might say it’s a 
    natural science paper, but to me it’s a modern engineering paper. To 
    understand what’s going on with these large-scale processes, we have to 
    analyze them quantitatively, and the tools for getting good estimates have 
    been developed in engineering.”
 
 Packman was introduced to the co-authors of the paper -- ecologists who 
    study how dead leaves and soil drive stream ecology and who come from as far 
    away as Spain and Austria -- about 10 years ago through the activity of the 
    Stroud Water Research Center in Pennsylvania.
 
 Since then, they have collaborated on many similar projects around river 
    structure and transport dynamics. They are currently working on a project 
    funded by the National Science Foundation on the dynamics of organic carbon 
    in rivers and trying to understand how carbon delivered from upstream areas 
    influence the ecology of downstream locations.
 
 “The broadest idea is really part of global change efforts to understand 
    carbon cycling over the whole Earth, which is an enormous challenge,” 
    Packman said.
 
 SOURCE: Northwestern University
 |