| Budget Office warns against directing US stimulus 
    funds to energy 
 Washington (Platts)--22Jan2008
 
 Though persistently high energy prices will be a major contributor in
 2008's grim economic outlook, US Congressional Budget Office Director Peter
 Orszag told the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday that it would not be
 effective to add new incentives for alternative energy projects or new
 energy-related public projects to an upcoming stimulus bill.
 
 Orszag told the panel that the US will likely experience at least some
 slow growth in 2008, and recommended a temporary package of benefits and
 rebates for low-income people, and other measures that might boost the 
    economy
 in the short term.
 
 In his testimony, Orszag concluded that funneling money toward new energy
 production, like ethanol facilities, would "tend not to generate much
 short-term demand" because of the long lead time such projects require.
 
 The office recommended that Congress instead invest in incentives aimed
 at accelerating already-planned investment that can be brought online more
 quickly.
 
 Likewise, Orszag discouraged investment in grant-funded initiatives to
 develop alternative energy sources, saying such projects are "totally
 impractical for countercyclical policy, regardless of whatever other merits
 they may have."
 
 "In general, many if not most of these projects could end up making the
 economic situation worse because they would stimulate the economy at the 
    time
 that expansion was already well under way," Orszag said in his testimony.
 
 Asked whether increased investment in the Low-Income Home Energy
 Assistance Program might be helpful for poor households struggling to pay
 elevated heating costs, Orszag said that it would be difficult to distribute
 more than a few billion dollars to LIHEAP recipients in time to offset 
    heating
 costs this winter.
 
 --Jean Chemnick, 
    jean_chemnick@platts.com
   |