| Nuclear Plant Workers Show Higher Cancer Risks 
    US: January 29, 2008
 
 
 NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Workers at one US nuclear facility have suffered 
    higher-than-average rates of certain cancers, a study shows -- suggesting 
    that on-the-job exposures are to blame.
 
 
 The study looked at nearly 19,000 employees of the Savannah River Site, a 
    South Carolina facility that has processed nuclear materials since the 
    1950s.
 
 Researchers found that while death rates from many causes were lower than 
    national rates, workers had higher-than-expected rates of death from certain 
    cancers.
 
 Among men, leukemia and cancer of the pleura, the tissue covering the lungs 
    and lining the chest cavity, caused an abnormally high number of deaths, 
    while female workers had elevated rates of kidney and skin cancers.
 
 Pleural cancer is strongly related to long-term exposure to asbestos. Some 
    workers at the Savannah River Site were apparently overexposed to asbestos, 
    based on "industrial hygiene" reports from the early 1970s, according to the 
    researchers.
 
 Dr. David B. Richardson and colleagues at the University of North Carolina 
    at Chapel Hill report the findings in the American Journal of Industrial 
    Medicine.
 
 The study included 18,883 employees of the Savannah River Site who were 
    hired prior to 1987 and worked there for at least three months.
 
 When the researchers looked at deaths from all causes and deaths from all 
    cancers as a whole, the workers had rates that were below the US norm. 
    However, as mentioned, there was an excess of certain cancers.
 
 "It is plausible," Richardson and his colleagues write, "that occupational 
    hazards, including asbestos and ionizing radiation, contribute to these 
    excesses."
 
 The findings highlight the importance of ongoing government research into 
    former nuclear workers' health, according to the researchers. This, they 
    write, will be key to understanding "the range of potential occupational 
    health effects," especially diseases that typically take years to become 
    apparent.
 
 SOURCE: American Journal of Industrial Medicine, December 2007.
 
 
 REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
 
  |