Park Service airs complaint against proposed
coal plant
Jan 16 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - John G. Edwards Las Vegas
Review-Journal
The National Park Service says the $3.8 billion, coal-fired power plant that
Nevada utilities propose to build near Ely is "unacceptable" because it
would damage air and water quality and would interfere with scenic views in
the Great Basin National Park.
"Like a clean white page, the relatively clear air in the Great Basin can be
marred easily," wrote Paul DePrey, park superintendent.
DePrey made the comment in a Jan. 9 letter to the Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection in response to the draft air permit the division
has issued for the 1,500-megawatt Ely Energy Center. The center is a project
of Sierra Pacific Power Co. and Nevada Power Co.
The division can issue a final permit without substantial changes in the
draft document, amend the permit or deny it after reviewing comments about
the power plant.
Utility spokesman Adam Grant said: "We agree with NDEP's initial filing that
the Ely Energy Center meets all existing air quality standard regulations.
This is all part of the NDEP environmental process, and we're not going to
comment any further."
Division spokesman Dante Pistone said NDEP does not give comments from
federal agencies any more weight than from others.
"As a rule, we normally don't comment on the comments," Pistone said.
The division may take six months or more before deciding on the Ely Energy
Center air permit application, he said.
The park service's letter says that coal-fired power plants in Utah appear
to cause a brown-yellow haze after long periods of northeasterly winds.
"Fortunately, winds are seldom northeasterly for long periods," DePrey said.
"If similar pollution sources were built to the west, the parks visibility
would be affected more frequently. White Pine County's night skies are among
the darkest in the country."
Air pollution would scatter light in the night sky and cause less
visibility.
"Dark night skies, for the first time in history, are becoming an extinct
phenomenon," he said.
Acid rain could affect life on land and in lakes in the Great Basin, he
said.
Charles Benjamin, a spokesman for the Nevada Clean Energy Campaign, a group
that opposes the power plant, supported the park service's arguments.
The state agency, as the delegate of the Environmental Protection Agency, is
legally charged with "preserving, protecting and enhancing national parks
and wilderness areas," Benjamin said.
"The draft (air) permit doesn't do enough to protect the park," he said.
Benjamin criticized the state division for failing to consider the combined
air pollution from the 1,600-megawatt coal plant under development by LS
Power Group and from the Ely center.
Some Ely residents last week told the division they wanted the jobs that
would come with the Ely center, but Benjamin said the division may not
consider job creation as a factor in approving an air permit.
A trio of federal agencies will host a pair of public meetings Thursday in
Las Vegas to field comments on a draft impact statement for designating
energy corridors on public lands for oil, gas and hydrogen pipelines and
electrical power transmission lines.
The meeting by the Department of Energy, the Bureau of Land Management and
the U.S. Forest Service will be from 2 to 5 p.m. and 6 to 8 p.m. at the
Atomic Testing Museum, 1755 E. Flamingo Road.
Two environmental groups, Western Resource Advocates and The Wilderness
Society, said in a statement Tuesday that "not only would these proposed
corridors slice through high-value public lands, they would hard-wire a coal
economy onto the 21st century West." |