US senator demands independent probe into Bush's SPR
fill plan Washington (Platts)--3Jan2008 US Senator Charles Schumer Thursday demanded an independent investigation of the Bush administration's plan to continue stockpiling oil in the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve even as crude prices breached $100/b. The New York Democrat asked the Government Accountability Office to probe whether the Bush administration's planned acquisition of 12 million barrels of crude oil to fill the SPR over the next six months skirts a law meant to stop the federal government from acquiring oil amid a price shock. When Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005, it included language to ensure that future oil acquisitions made fiscal sense for taxpayers, and that fills would not "appreciably" affect the price of crude oil or crude products, like gasoline, diesel or heating oil. Schumer said that to comply with the law today, the Bush administration would have to "defer in-kind transfers of oil and instead accept cash payments, at a premium, from the oil companies holding government leases to drill in the Gulf of Mexico." In a written request to the GAO, Schumer noted that the act, which authorized the refilling of the SPR, stipulated that any purchasing plan "minimize the costs to the Department of the Interior and the Department of Energy in acquiring such petroleum products (including foregone revenues to the Treasury when petroleum products for the SPR are obtained through the royalty-in-kind program)." Schumer questioned whether the administration's plan to increase its deposits to the reserve by 20,000 b/d beginning in February despite record oil prices is at odds with this cost-minimization requirement. He urged the GAO to do a cost-benefit analysis to resolve the question, and in the interim, demanded that the Department of Energy release the internal economic analysis supporting the agency's decision to push ahead with filling the SPR at this time. "The administration's insistence on refilling the strategic reserve at this time isn't just a bad business decision, it may very well go against what is intended by law," Schumer said in a statement. --Cathy Landry, cathy_landry@platts.com
|