Alternative energy a popular stop in U.S. campaign
By Andrea Hopkins
WELLSVILLE, Ohio (Reuters) - A small green clearing on a hilltop beside the
Ohio River doesn't seem like much of campaign stop, but John Baardson knows
the scent of alternative energy and undecided voters will lure America's
presidential contenders before long.
"McCain has already called and expressed interest, and we believe Obama will
too," said the president and chief executive of Baard Energy.
Before Americans go to the polls in November to choose Republican John
McCain or Democrat Barack Obama to be the next U.S. president, Baardson
plans to break ground on a $6 billion plant in Wellsville that will turn
Appalachian coal into 53,000 barrels a day of diesel and jet fuel.
The plant, designed to produce fuel that costs just $60 to $70 a barrel with
46 percent fewer emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than
conventional diesel fuels, is an irresistible draw for the 2008 presidential
hopefuls.
With oil at $130 a barrel and gasoline at $4 a gallon, energy and the
economy has vaulted to the top of the political agenda, and McCain and Obama
have both sought to portray themselves as proponents of cheaper
alternatives.
That Baard's plant will be in Ohio, the politically critical state in
President George W. Bush 2004 election victory that could once again help
determine the outcome of this election, is just a happy coincidence.
"The politics are fascinating," Baardson said. "We want to drive home the
point that if you want the voters in this area, this is something you can
give them ... the price of oil is the number one issue out there and we have
a clean solution."
The plant will bring at least 1,500 construction and 200 full-time jobs to
impoverished eastern Ohio. In addition, some 18,000 tons of coal a day will
be liquefied into fuel suitable for use in jets and trucks -- adding an
estimated 750 mining jobs to the mix.
In return for the jobs and home-grown fuel supply, Baard wants the
government to offer loan guarantees and Air Force fuel contracts. The state
of Ohio helped lure the plant, which is mostly privately funded, with tax
incentives.
While conservative Republicans see more drilling as the best answer to
America's oil needs and liberal Democrats want to focus on wind, solar and
biofuels, the politics of coal -- which supplies about 50 percent of
America's energy needs -- is complex.
Moderates on both sides have found something to like about Baard's
coal-to-liquid plant, which gasifies woodwaste and coal and captures and
sequesters about 85 percent of the resultant carbon dioxide emissions in the
region's coal beds.
More importantly, analysts believe embracing coal-to-liquid technologies and
others like it may offer Obama a way to win over white working class voters
in the area, an economically depressed but culturally conservative region
that supported rival Hillary Clinton in the Democratic nominating process.
TOO CLOSE TO CALL
Obama has a track record of supporting coal, since coal mining is also a
staple of his home state, Illinois. But whether that will be enough to win
over voters concerned about his race or reputation as a liberal elite is not
clear.
"Right now Obama has the more difficult challenge in this region than
McCain, but the economy is in lousy shape so Democrats should be able to
connect," said Herb Asher, a professor of political science at Ohio State
University,
"It's an important area -- only 10 percent of (Ohio's) vote but it can move
back and forth. I think at this stage it's a challenge for Obama but he
doesn't have to carry it -- even if he loses, the votes he gets could make
the difference."
Polls show Obama with a small lead over McCain in Ohio, but the state is
considered too close to call.
Chris Gagin knows the district can swing politically. The district
director for Democratic Rep. Charlie Wilson, who supports the Baard plant,
Gagin sees people every day who voted strongly for his own Democratic boss
and the state's Democratic governor -- but also elected Bush in 2000 and
2004.
Obama, he admitted, will be hard-pressed to win over the region's working
class voters.
"The whole Muslim issue, and race issue, is something nobody talks about,
but it's there," said Gagin. "Clean coal is a way for Obama to introduce
himself to these folks (to show what) they have in common, but it won't be
the determining factor for most of them."
False rumors that Obama is a Muslim have dogged his campaign in rural areas,
and exit polls from the Democratic primary showed race was a concern to many
voters. Obama would be the first black U.S. president.
Many voters are still mulling their choices.
"I'm undecided," said Evelyn Miller, 80, a retired poll worker and Red Cross
volunteer. She's a registered Democrat but voted for Bush in 2004 -- "I
regret that," she said -- and is leaning toward supporting Obama. But she's
just not sure.
"I don't know much about him," said Miller.
Eric Foltin, 35, will vote for Obama. The son of a coal miner, Foltin's top
concern is the economy. He works as a screen printer but can't afford health
insurance. But while Foltin likes Obama, he admits few of his friends do.
"Because he's black," Foltin said. "People down here are real nice, but
they're narrow-minded, real conservative."
(Editing by Michael Conlon and David Wiessler)
|