Australia's Plan for "Diabolical" Climate Change
AUSTRALIA: July 7, 2008
Australia, one of the world's top carbon emitters per person, will unveil an
emissions trading scheme later this year, which it hopes will help cut the
country's carbon footprint.
The scheme is a major initiative of Kevin Rudd's Labor government, and is
due to start operating in 2010.
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong will outline the government's options for
carbon trading later in July, with the system to be finalised and laws sent
to parliament by the end of the year.
The government's key climate adviser, economist Ross Garnaut, released his
draft report on climate change and carbon trading on Friday, July 4.
Here are some details on how a cap and trade scheme can work.
HOW DO EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEMES' WORK?
* A national upper limit, or 'cap' for carbon emissions is set according to
the country's target.
* Companies audit emissions, and reduce them to hit the target by buying
permits that allow them to emit above-target levels of carbon. Companies
with under-limit emissions sell permits to those unable to keep within their
ceiling.
* Limits can tighten over time. Polluting businesses then migrate to cleaner
technologies to cut costs, speeding the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Start-ups are also dissuaded from going into carbon-heavy technologies.
WHAT SECTORS WILL BE AFFECTED IN AUSTRALIA?
* Details have not been released, but the scheme will likely include as many
energy sources as possible. Government climate adviser Ross Garnaut, who
calls climate change a "diabolical problem", has suggested fuel should be
included, as excluding it would put a bigger burden on other polluters.
* Likely suspects, farmers, coal miners and power generators, could be asked
to bid for carbon permits at auction, rather than be given free permits. The
previous conservative government wanted initial exemptions for farmers and
free carbon permits for the coal industry to soften the economic blow.
* Some economists say the Australian permit auction could net A$20 billion
(US$19.2 billion) -- money which could go towards subsidising higher
electricity and petrol prices.
WHY ARE AUSSIE EMISSIONS SO HIGH?
* In a word, coal. Australia relies on it to generate about 80 percent of
its electricity. Greenhouse gases are emitted both in coal mining and when
the fossil fuel is burnt.
* Cutting coal emissions is not easy -- Australia is also the world's
largest coal exporter, sending more than A$26 billion of coal overseas in
2007/8, mostly to Asian neighbours.
* Despite having 0.32 per cent of the global population, it is responsible
for about 1.5 percent of all carbon emissions. Each Australian's emissions
were 4.5 times the global average in 2004 -- pushed up by coal and other
fossil fuels.
WHAT ARE THE NATIONAL GOALS?
* To reduce 2000 emissions by 60 percent by 2050. Under the Kyoto Protocol,
ratified by Labor last year, it must limit growth in greenhouse emissions to
108 percent of 1990 levels by 2012.
* Hard-hit by the worst drought in century, Australia last year introduced
stringent water restrictions, and concerns about global warming rose. But
with inflation soaring and high fuel prices already angering voters, making
tough moves to meet national goals may not be popular. * Moving to 'clean
coal' is being presented as a means to cut emissions without abandoning the
profitable industry. But with this technology still fledgling, some expect
carbon-lite energy sources such as natural gas and nuclear will benefit.
DO CAP-AND-TRADE SCHEMES WORK?
* There are success stories. An early 1990s cap-and-trade system to combat
acid rain by limiting sulfur dioxide emissions saw United States power
plants cut back successfully, and at lower than expected costs.
* Greenhouse gas schemes are modelled on the acid rain program, but experts
say carbon schemes are wider-ranging, (covering many greenhouse pollutants
instead of just one) and their international nature makes them more
complicated and costly. Technology to capture and store carbon from
coal-fired power plants is also not as developed as acid rain systems.
* Europe introduced the world's largest cap-and-trade scheme for greenhouse
gases in 2005. In 2007, it set the goal to reduce greenhouse gases by 20
percent by 2020. But the Australia scheme is expected to be broader in
reach.
* Some say carbon taxes are more appropriate than trading schemes, others
say they are just one approach among many needed.
Sources: Reuters, Garnaut Climate Change Review (http://www.garnautreview.org.au/CA25734E0016A131/pages/home),
CSIRO (http://www.csiro.au/news/GlobalCarbonProject-PNAS.html) European
Union Emissions Trading Scheme (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/emission.htm)
(Writing by Gillian Murdoch, Beijing Editorial Reference Unit)
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
|