| California Ports' Pollution Plan Proves a Big Haul
US: July 24, 2008
LOS ANGELES - A short drive from the sandy beaches of Malibu rise two
sprawling ports, where goods from around the world enter the United States
before fanning out by road and rail to stores from coast to coast.
The adjacent ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the United States'
biggest, see nearly half of the nation's container traffic and are key to
insuring goods made in China make it to retailers like Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
But the ports hold another, less honorable distinction: They are the biggest
polluters in Southern California.
Concerns about pollution-linked illnesses in local communities stalled port
expansion projects for years before both ports in 2006 agreed to slash
pollutants -- mainly exhaust from diesel engines -- to below 2001 levels in
five years.
The ports are requiring cleaner vessel fuels, shoreside electricity so ships
will not run their dirty diesel engines at berth, newer truck fleets and
cleaner train locomotives. Much of the plan is funded by increased fees for
customers.
"We were dead in the water, and we had to stick our neck out to do some
things, so we did," Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Geraldine Knatz
said in a recent interview.
The plan, however, is proving to be easier said than done.
Already, some shippers, truckers and others who don't want to make changes
are choosing other ports, according to Knatz, who said port traffic could
drop 10 percent to 15 percent.
Meanwhile, the trucking industry said it plans to sue over what it says is
the ports' plan to micromanage its business, while the railroads say they
can't comply with a 2014 deadline for new locomotives because the technology
won't be available.
Also, retailers are balking at having to pay fees to fund the ports' clean
trucks program while also investing in new trucks, according to the Retail
Industry Leaders Association.
'YOU CAN'T HIDE'
The ports say they haven't been surprised by the reactions to such a
sweeping plan, and are digging in their heels.
"We knew going in if our plan was really good that we would upset
everybody," said Port of Long Beach spokesman Art Wong.
Port officials say other major US ports -- Oakland, Seattle, Newark, Houston
-- will eventually follow Long Beach and Los Angeles' emissions reductions
efforts.
To local residents, the 17,000 trucks that travel in and out of the ports
are the most visible sources of pollution. Daily, they dominate the freeway
that runs into the ports and through the outlying residential neighborhoods.
The ports themselves sprawl for miles down the Pacific coast, their massive
ships and cranes dominating the horizon. It can take 15 minutes to find your
way out of either port.
For the port industries, a major worry is having to comply with requirements
that vary by location. The railroads, for instance, are in the midst of
complying with a 2010 California state deadline to switch to cleaner
locomotives, but the ports' plan would require newer technology a few years
later.
"The railroads had just made a commitment to change... and then 'Oh, by the
way change out your fleet again,'" said Kirk Marckwald director of the
locomotive emissions reduction project for the Association of American
Railroads. "That has horrific costs."
The most controversial portion of the ports' plan, so far, involves the move
to ban pre-1989 trucks later this year. Trucks older than 2007 will be
banned beginning in 2012. The trucking industry, which agrees on the need
for cleaner trucks, says the ports are going too far by checking up on
truckers' compliance with federal safety and security standards.
"You could have every port that deals with containers setting up this
patchwork of what they believe is the best," said Curtis Whalen, executive
director of the Intermodal Motor Carriers Conference of the American
Trucking Association.
The ATA has threatened to sue over the issue.
Even the ports disagree on how to implement the truck program. Los Angeles
has mandated that only trucking company employees will be allowed in the
port, arguing that will make the program easier to implement and monitor.
Long Beach
Story by Nichola Groom
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE
 |