| Alarming Growth In Expected CO2 Emissions In 
    China 3/11/2008 Berkeley, CA
 The growth in China's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is far outpacing 
    previous estimates, making the goal of stabilizing atmospheric greenhouse 
    gases even more difficult, according to a new analysis by economists at the 
    University of California, Berkeley, and UC San Diego.
 Previous estimates, including those used by the Intergovernmental Panel on 
    Climate Change, say the region that includes China will see a 2.5 to 5 
    percent annual increase in CO2 emissions, the largest contributor to 
    atmospheric greenhouse gases, between 2004 and 2010. The new UC analysis 
    puts that annual growth rate for China to at least 11 percent for the same 
    time period.
 
 The study is scheduled for print publication in the May issue of the Journal 
    of Environmental Economics and Management, but is now online.
 
 The researchers' most conservative forecast predicts that by 2010, there 
    will be an increase of 600 million metric tons of carbon emissions in China 
    over the country's levels in 2000. This growth from China alone would 
    dramatically overshadow the 116 million metric tons of carbon emissions 
    reductions pledged by all the developed countries in the Kyoto Protocol. 
    (The protocol was never ratified in the United States, which was the largest 
    single emitter of carbon dioxide until 2006, when China took over that 
    distinction, according to numerous reports.)
 
 Put another way, the projected annual increase in China alone over the next 
    several years is greater than the current emissions produced by either Great 
    Britain or Germany.
 
 Based upon these findings, the authors say current global warming forecasts 
    are "overly optimistic," and that action is urgently needed to curb 
    greenhouse gas production in China and other rapidly industrializing 
    countries.
 
 The authors of the study, Maximillian Auffhammer, UC Berkeley assistant 
    professor of agricultural and resource economics, and Richard Carson, UC San 
    Diego professor of economics, based their findings upon pollution data from 
    China's 30 provincial entities.
 
 Auffhammer said this paper should serve as an alarm challenging the widely 
    held belief that actions taken by the wealthy, industrialized nations alone 
    represent a viable strategy towards the goal of stabilizing atmospheric 
    concentrations of carbon dioxide.
 
 "Making China and other developing countries an integral part of any future 
    climate agreement is now even more important," said Auffhammer. "It had been 
    expected that the efficiency of China's power generation would continue to 
    improve as per capita income increased, slowing down the rate of CO2 
    emissions growth. What we're finding instead is that the emissions growth 
    rate is surpassing our worst expectations, and that means the goal of 
    stabilizing atmospheric CO2 is going to be much, much harder to achieve."
 
 Researchers traditionally calculate the CO2 emissions for a region or 
    country from data on fossil fuel consumption. Existing models then use those 
    emission figures and factor in such variables as population size, a 
    society's affluence and technology developments to forecast the growth of 
    greenhouse gas emissions.
 
 In explaining the startling differences in results from previous estimates 
    for China's carbon emissions growth, the UC researchers point out that they 
    used province-level figures in their analysis to obtain a more detailed 
    picture of the country's CO2 emissions up to 2004.
 
 "Everybody had been treating China as single country, but each of the 
    country's provinces is larger than many European countries, both in 
    geographic size and population," said Carson. "In addition, there is a wide 
    range in economic development and wealth from one province to the next, as 
    well as major differences in population growth, all of which has an effect 
    on energy consumption that cannot be easily addressed in models based upon 
    aggregate national data."
 
 Since data on fossil fuel consumption is not reported at the province level 
    in China, the researchers used waste gas emissions, available from China's 
    state environmental protection administration reports, as a proxy for CO2 
    emissions in this paper.
 
 Moreover, the researchers said, the majority of other studies forecasting 
    China's CO2 emissions relied upon information from nearly a decade ago. 
    During the 1990s, per capita income was growing faster than the use of 
    energy in China, which typically relates to slower growth in carbon 
    emissions.
 
 "A notable shift occurred in China around the year 2000, around the time 
    when hope for an agreement with the U.S. on the Kyoto Protocol began to 
    diminish along with external pressure for China to reduce its emissions," 
    said Carson. "Energy use started to grow faster than income, and much of the 
    energy that was used wasn't efficient."
 
 The authors also pointed out that after 2000, China's central government 
    began shifting the responsibility for building new power plants to 
    provincial officials who had less incentive and fewer resources to build 
    cleaner, more efficient plants, which save money in the long run but are 
    more expensive to construct.
 
 "Government officials turned away from energy efficiency as an objective to 
    expanding power generation as quickly as they can, and as cheaply as they 
    can," said Carson. "Wealthier coastal provinces tended to build 
    clean-burning power plants based upon the very best technology available, 
    but many of the poorer interior provinces replicated inefficient 1950s 
    Soviet technology."
 
 "The problem is that power plants, once built, are meant to last for 40 to 
    75 years," said Carson. "These provincial officials have locked themselves 
    into a long-run emissions trajectory that is much higher than people had 
    anticipated. Our forecast incorporates the fact that much of China is now 
    stuck with power plants that are dirty and inefficient."
 
 SOURCE: University of California - Berkeley
 |