| DOE: Expect License Application After All   Mar 17 - Las Vegas Review - Journal
 The Energy Department has readjusted its Yucca Mountain work plans after a 
    deep budget cut and will be ready after all to apply for a license in June 
    to build a Nevada nuclear waste repository, the program director said 
    Thursday.
 
 Managers postponed work on a Nevada rail line and other segments of the 
    Yucca program, and redirected money and personnel to reach the most pressing 
    goal of meeting a June 30 license application deadline, according to Ward 
    Sproat, director of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.
 
 Applying for a construction license has been a long-sought but out-of-reach 
    milestone for DOE at Yucca Mountain. The department has encountered legal 
    and budget problems, and a number of internal missteps in recent years.
 
 Speaking at a conference organized by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Sproat expressed confidence the application will pass initial muster to be 
    docketed by the NRC for more thorough safety reviews and hearings.
 
 Cutbacks will reduce the work force from 2,600 to 1,500-1,700. The Energy 
    Department has singled out key scientists and engineers within DOE, the U.S. 
    Geological Survey, the national laboratories and contract firm Bechtel SAIC 
    who will be needed to defend the license.
 
 "We have identified who those people are to make sure they know their jobs 
    are not in jeopardy," Sproat said. "We have an army of national lab PhDs and 
    engineers on our defense team."
 
 Sproat's upbeat assessment came minutes after a lawyer who represents Nevada 
    in its ongoing battle against Yucca Mountain declared the program is on a 
    "death watch" and is destined for failure.
 
 Martin Malsch, of the firm Egan, Fitzpatrick & Malsch, said DOE will 
    continue to face increasingly severe budget problems. He said DOE's 
    application will be rushed and incomplete and predicted a "huge dispute" 
    over whether it should be accepted for review by regulators.
 
 Beyond that, Nevada is poised to challenge DOE's qualifications and other 
    key aspects of the project, he said. On top of that, both Democratic 
    presidential candidates have pledged to stop the program if elected.
 
 "Yucca Mountain's breaths are short and its heartbeat is faint," Malsch 
    said. "I really don't think it has very long to continue."
 
 In response, Sproat said: "The death watch is going to continue for a very 
    long time because I see this program being very alive and well."
 
 The Energy Department was sent back to the drawing boards late last year 
    when Congress cut the 2008 Yucca Mountain budget by $108 million, a 22 
    percent reduction.
 
 Sproat initially expressed doubt DOE would meet its deadline, but he said 
    managers deferred work on all but the most pressing tasks. For instance, 
    work on a proposed Nevada rail line to the site has been pushed back.
 
 To save money further, technical specialists were rotated in for short 
    periods to perform specific tasks and then let go, Sproat said.
 
 Questions remain about the repository, which would need billions of dollars 
    to be built. Sproat confirmed the Bush administration is considering a 
    proposal to reorganize the Yucca project and other nuclear waste programs 
    into a government-chartered corporation similar to the Tennessee Valley 
    Authority or the Bonneville Power Administration.
 
 Promoters contend such an organization would have the advantages of a 
    private business to hire and fire managers, set salaries to attract talent 
    and promote accountability. Sproat said it would stop a revolving door that 
    has seen numerous top managers trying to run the Yucca program for short 
    terms.
 
 But such a big change would require a number of fundamental changes and 
    approval by Congress, which might not be willing to give up control.
 
 The Energy Daily in a Feb. 26 story quoted sources saying the DOE proposal 
    has been at the White House for consideration since at least December. 
    Sproat could not confirm that, saying he understood the concept still was 
    being mulled within DOE.
 
 "I personally don't expect we are going to make anything significant happen 
    on this over the next three to six months," he said.
 
 Steve Kraft, senior director for used fuel management at the Nuclear Energy 
    Institute, said a "move like that would greatly enhance the chances of 
    success of the Yucca Mountain project and recently Congress is not inclined 
    to enhance the success of the Yucca Mountain project."
 
 Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., long has been declaring Yucca Mountain dead and his 
    spokesman said no new plan would change that.
 
 The Associated Press contributed to this report.Contact Stephens Washington 
    Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or (202) 
    783-1760.
 
 (c) 2008 Las Vegas Review - Journal. Provided by ProQuest 
    Information and Learning. All rights Reserved.
 |