| Lawmakers push for clean energy department   Mar 8 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Brian Lockhart The Stamford 
    Advocate, Conn.
 A group of lawmakers, including state Rep. Terry Backer, D-Stratford, 
    yesterday called for the creation of a new Department of Clean Energy to 
    help the state reduce its dependence on oil.
 
 "The days of plentiful, cheap oil are drawing to an end," Backer told 
    reporters during an afternoon news conference. "It isn't a question of 
    whether we will switch to a clean-energy economy, but when."
 
 Backer also is executive director of Norwalk-based Soundkeeper, a 
    20-year-old organization working to protect Long Island Sound.
 
 He has been trying to sound the alarm over the concept of "peak oil" -- when 
    there are no new oil supplies left to be tapped.
 
 In November, Backer and other peak oil converts, including state Rep. Carlo 
    Leone, D-Stamford, and state Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, heard from energy 
    experts who testified that the world either reached maximum oil production 
    in 2005, or will in 2012.
 
 That hearing led to the drafting of the bill to create a Clean Energy 
    Department, which would plan a state shift to a greater reliance on 
    renewable energy and improve conservation.
 
 Backer said there are now too many agencies and entities within state 
    government in charge of energy, and a focused department is needed.
 
 "Right now, we do energy policy very piecemeal in Connecticut," he said.
 
 State Rep. Diana Urban, D-Stonington, who joined Backer yesterday, said the 
    initiative also would help the state economy.
 
 "We can baby-sit our dwindling oil supply and continue to fight resource 
    wars, (or) we can move forward with new technologies and look at the 
    economic growth that's going to bring," Urban said. "The state that steps up 
    and says they're going to embrace renewables . . . is the state that leads 
    us into the future."
 
 A public hearing on the Department of Clean Energy bill was scheduled for 
    late yesterday before the legislature's Energy Committee.
 
 The bill also called for creation of a $2 billion pool of state bonding 
    money the department could use over an unspecified number of years to 
    further its mission.
 
 State Rep. Steve Fontana, D-North Haven, co-chairman of the Energy 
    Committee, said he has traditionally opposed creating new departments.
 
 Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell in 2006 and 2007 tried unsuccessfully to 
    convince lawmakers to establish a new Department of Energy to focus on the 
    state's energy future.
 
 "I like this proposal better," Fontana said, adding that Backer's plan 
    appears to be more "narrowly tailored" than Rell's.
 
 A Rell spokesman declined comment on the Clean Energy Department bill.
 
 Fontana said he also is concerned about peak oil.
 
 "It's happening now and faster than I would have predicted," he said.
 
 But Energy Committee Co-chairman Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, did not 
    envision the new department being created this year.
 
 "A lot more people need to get their arms around its mission," he said. "We 
    as a committee can't do that in the short time we have."
 
 Christopher Phelps, spokesman for Environment Connecticut, a nonprofit, 
    nonpartisan environmental advocacy organization, agreed the proposal was too 
    ambitious to pass this legislative session.
 
 But he said it is important to make the proposal and begin the conversation.
 
 Freshman state Rep. Kimberly Fawcett, D-Fairfield, a member of the 
    Environmental Committee, said she has great respect for Backer but was also 
    concerned about the $2 billion price tag.
 
 "This is an urgent, vital issue. We have to move on clean energy," Fawcett 
    said. "But when you take $2 billion, you have to take it from something else 
    -- public safety or education."
 
 Backer during yesterday's news conference said he knew that it would be a 
    fight to pass a $2 billion idea on a topic such as peak oil.
 
 He said it is easier for lawmakers to commit equal sums of money to other 
    projects -- from universities to stadiums -- that can have a more immediate 
    impact and help them win votes.
 
 But he cautioned, in the not-too-distant future, residents will begin asking 
    lawmakers what they are doing about peak oil and the looming energy crisis.
 
 "This is not some far-off problem," Backer said.
 |