NRDC: 32 Coal-Fired Power Plants In 13 States
Now Up In The Air After Major Court Ruling On Mercury
3/3/2008
Washington, DC - The prospects for 32 coal-fired power plants in 13 states
have been shaken up in the wake of a February 8, 2008 federal appeals court
ruling that requires each new coal-fired power plant in the U.S. to adopt
stringent toxic air pollution control measures meeting the most rigorous
standards under the Clean Air Act, according to the Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRD).
The states identified with the most coal-fired power plants now up in the
air are: Michigan (four), Wyoming (four), Illinois (three), Nevada (three),
Ohio (three), Pennsylvania (three), Texas (three), Iowa (two), Kentucky
(two), Louisiana (two), Georgia (one), New Mexico (one) and North Carolina
(one).
The ruling will impact various aspects of three dozen or more coal-fired
power plants, including some now already under construction.
Major coal-fired power plants impacted by the ruling include: LS Power White
Pine (1500 MW - permit pending in Nevada); Sierra Ely (1500 MW - permit
pending in Nevada); Toquop (850 MW - permit pending in Nevada) Desert Rock (Sithe
Global's 1500 MW in New Mexico); Longleaf ( LS Power's 1200 MW Plant in
Georgia); Cliffside (Duke Energy's 800 MW Plant in North Carolina); Alliant
Marshalltown (600 MW - permit pending in Iowa); LS Power Waterloo (750 MW -
permit pending in Iowa); AMP (1000 MW - permit challenged in Ohio); LS
Power/Dynegy (750 MW in Michigan). For a complete list of all 32 plants, go
to http://www.nrdc.org.
Natural Resources Defense Council Clean Air Director/Senior Attorney John
Walke said: "The February 8th court ruling will have far-reaching
consequences for coal-fired power plant construction, permitting and
pollution controls. This important new legal tool will increase the
pollution control obligations for new coal-fired power plants, raise the
already considerable expense of these projects, and add to the weight of
arguments that the public deploys to oppose conventional coal-fired plants."
Dr. Jennifer Sass, senior scientist, NRDC Public Health Program, said: "We
need to remind that this is not just some fight in a court room. It also
goes to the heart of a major public health crisis. Failing to clean up
mercury pollution sentences our children to a life of lost opportunities.
Mt. Sinai researchers have used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and studies that link elevated mercury levels with IQ
loss to estimate that 300,000-600,000 children each year are born with
mercury in their blood at levels associated with a loss of IQ. The Mt. Sinai
study limited its calculations to the costs associated with loss of
intelligence only. There also are data from Europe suggesting that mercury
poisoning is associated with increases in deaths from heart disease, which
is the top killer in the United States."
In New Jersey v. U.S. EPA, No. 05-1162, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
D.C. Circuit vacated (overturned) two EPA mercury rules covering coal- and
oil-fired power plants. Under the court ruling, power plants will need to
install pollution control equipment to control not just mercury emissions
but arsenic, lead, chromium and all other air toxics emitted from
coal-burning. This legal tool will require a new and additional evaluation
of pollution limits and control technologies covering all air toxics emitted
by power plants, and will increase the pollution control obligations for new
coal-fired power plants.
In 2005, EPA issued two highly controversial regulations covering just
mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants: (1) a rule that removed such
power plants from the list of industries requiring the Clean Air Act's
rigorous "Maximum Achievable Control Technology" (MACT) standards for each
electric generation unit in the country to sharply reduce its toxic air
pollution; and (2) a regulation that substituted a mercury pollution trading
regime, which greatly weakened required mercury cuts from power plants,
dispensed with the need to reduce mercury from each electric generation unit
in the country, and walked away from regulating all other forms of toxic air
pollution from power plants. EPA's mercury pollution trading rule also
stretched out full compliance with the trading scheme until the mid-2020's,
rather than requiring full compliance with more protective MACT standards by
no later than 2008.
Before EPA illegally removed power plants from the regulatory list requiring
adoption of MACT standards, each new coal-fired power plants proposed for
construction starting in 2001 was required to be controlled to levels no
less stringent than MACT, established by permitting authorities in the
plant's preconstruction permit. Several states issued preconstruction
permits for new coal-fired power plants between 2001 and 2005 containing
mercury emissions limitations that were far more stringent than the weak
mercury limits that EPA's 2005 mercury rule applied to new coal-fired power
plants: EPA's trading rule allowed anywhere from 4 to 20 times more mercury
from new coal-fired power plants than these state permit mercury limits. The
court's ruling makes clear that power plants remain on the regulatory list
requiring adoption of stringent MACT standards and pollution controls for
all new coal-fired power plants.
SOURCE: NRDC
|