Senate panel clears climate change bill
IDAHO
Mar 4 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Jared S. Hopkins The
Times-News, Twin Falls, Idaho
The Senate Resources and Conservation Committee voted 6 to 3 on Monday in
favor of a resolution that would ask two state agencies to submit a report
on climate change to the Legislature, with support from GOP senators split
over the controversial subject matter.
The resolution would begin addressing two parts of the Idaho Energy Plan
adopted last year. The Office of Energy Resources and Department of
Environmental Quality would together prepare recommendations if Idaho were
to enter greenhouse gas regulation, and also place high priority on
developing conservation and renewable resources in Idaho. The report would
be submitted to an interim energy task force.
Sen. Kate Kelly, D-Boise, told the committee Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter
recently formed the new office and its responsibilities include the
resolution's requests. She said that other Western states have policies that
encourage renewable resources, and that Idaho will miss out on
opportunities.
"This is just pulling together things that are already being done," she
said.
Rep. Sharon Block, R-Twin Falls, a co-sponsor, told the committee that
Idaho's value lies in natural resources, and that the resolution will bring
to light more economic opportunities.
"Idaho is rich with geothermal potential, one of the best in the nation.
Geothermal is Idaho's oil," she said. "Gentlemen, there's a new gold rush on
the horizon, and we in Idaho have the gold."
Still, resistance came from the three Republican senators who opposed the
measure when it was introduced last month.
Sen. Dean Cameron, R-Rupert -- who when the legislation was introduced
questioned whether global warming was a "factor" in climate change --
questioned the bill presented as not having a fiscal impact.
"I don't think anyone does anything in government for free," said Cameron,
co-chairman of the state's joint budgeting panel.
Sen. Jeff Siddoway, R-Terreton, said he wondered if the study would mean too
much government affecting the economy, and said that ethanol plants receive
tax breaks.
"They were barely functional with $4 corn and now we have $10 corn," he
said. "I wonder if the market wouldn't be better served than if government
just kept out of the way.
DEQDirector Toni Hardesty said the agency is currently tracking how other
states operate to stay aware, aims to reduce energy consumption and improve
air quality, and senses momentum is building to regulate greenhouse gas
emission.
"I'm certainly not the person to stand up and debate the science of climate
change," she said. "What I can say to you is that when you look at the
actions we're taking on the executive branch side, there are so many
co-benefits associated."
Jared S. Hopkins may be reached at 420-8371 or jhopkins@magicvalley.com |