| Senate panel clears climate change bill   IDAHO Mar 4 - McClatchy-Tribune Regional News - Jared S. Hopkins The 
    Times-News, Twin Falls, Idaho
 The Senate Resources and Conservation Committee voted 6 to 3 on Monday in 
    favor of a resolution that would ask two state agencies to submit a report 
    on climate change to the Legislature, with support from GOP senators split 
    over the controversial subject matter.
 
 The resolution would begin addressing two parts of the Idaho Energy Plan 
    adopted last year. The Office of Energy Resources and Department of 
    Environmental Quality would together prepare recommendations if Idaho were 
    to enter greenhouse gas regulation, and also place high priority on 
    developing conservation and renewable resources in Idaho. The report would 
    be submitted to an interim energy task force.
 
 Sen. Kate Kelly, D-Boise, told the committee Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter 
    recently formed the new office and its responsibilities include the 
    resolution's requests. She said that other Western states have policies that 
    encourage renewable resources, and that Idaho will miss out on 
    opportunities.
 
 "This is just pulling together things that are already being done," she 
    said.
 
 Rep. Sharon Block, R-Twin Falls, a co-sponsor, told the committee that 
    Idaho's value lies in natural resources, and that the resolution will bring 
    to light more economic opportunities.
 
 "Idaho is rich with geothermal potential, one of the best in the nation. 
    Geothermal is Idaho's oil," she said. "Gentlemen, there's a new gold rush on 
    the horizon, and we in Idaho have the gold."
 
 Still, resistance came from the three Republican senators who opposed the 
    measure when it was introduced last month.
 
 Sen. Dean Cameron, R-Rupert -- who when the legislation was introduced 
    questioned whether global warming was a "factor" in climate change -- 
    questioned the bill presented as not having a fiscal impact.
 
 "I don't think anyone does anything in government for free," said Cameron, 
    co-chairman of the state's joint budgeting panel.
 
 Sen. Jeff Siddoway, R-Terreton, said he wondered if the study would mean too 
    much government affecting the economy, and said that ethanol plants receive 
    tax breaks.
 
 "They were barely functional with $4 corn and now we have $10 corn," he 
    said. "I wonder if the market wouldn't be better served than if government 
    just kept out of the way.
 
 DEQDirector Toni Hardesty said the agency is currently tracking how other 
    states operate to stay aware, aims to reduce energy consumption and improve 
    air quality, and senses momentum is building to regulate greenhouse gas 
    emission.
 
 "I'm certainly not the person to stand up and debate the science of climate 
    change," she said. "What I can say to you is that when you look at the 
    actions we're taking on the executive branch side, there are so many 
    co-benefits associated."
 
 Jared S. Hopkins may be reached at 420-8371 or jhopkins@magicvalley.com
 |